Week 4
Mon 22nd Jan - Sun 28th Jan 2024
Last updated
Mon 22nd Jan - Sun 28th Jan 2024
Last updated
Type of meeting: Weekly
Present: Peter [facilitator], Vanessa [documenter], André, Emotu, Eric, Judith, Tevo, Vanessa, WaKa, Will Tatz, Peter, Boaz, Musonda Bemba, Rojo, lord kizzy, Headelf, Curtis, Vasu
Town Hall Number: 82
The Ambassador Town Hall is a recurring event happening live on the Ambassador Zoom channel https://www.youtube.com/@SNET_Ambassador each Tuesday at 19:00 UTC.
topics covered: BGI 2024 summit, meeting summary tool, the Ambassador role, roles and levels, mental wellbeing, mental health, useful documentation, what data to capture to assign ambassador role, the human touch, transition from manual archiving to use of meeting summary tool
emotions: curious, questioning, resistant to change, data driven
Type of meeting: Biweekly
People present: Tevo [host], Tevo [documenter], Tevo, Shankar, Vanessa, Peter, André, love, Slate, Jade, Emotu, Sucren, Friday, Anthony, devon
Purpose: Aggregating Ambassador Program assets and relevant information under GitBook
Miro board: https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVN-9yivE=/?moveToWidget=3458764574355478962&cot=10
Working Docs:
How new people are introduced?
How are participants encouraged to learn how to engage in and about workgroup activities?
Information that is available to learn about workgroup
How do new people become workgroup members?
potential causes of low retention rate of contributors
Before doing public onboarding, we need clear entry-level tasks
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Go through participant task in the call to make sure we are able to recognize new participants in Dework
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
[action] Create an onboarding feedback form that is mainly meant for new members [assignee] Tevo [status] todo
Went over the Resource planning process
Share examples of the task outputs
Explained rewards for different tasks
Should Ambassador Program Onboarding Analysis be part of GitBook?
Should the Getting Started Google Doc version be available in GitBook?
The goal of an Ambassador GitBook: Should it be for resource management, How it related to Onboarding, What type of knowledge it should include
Include "Onboarding WG report Q4 2023 - Google Doc" in GitBook
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
topics covered: Onboarding, Getting Started, Video Script, Analysis, Proposal, Introduction, Feedback Form, Ambassador GitBook, Miro Board
emotions: This session had a lot of new members and we needed to slow down a lot to get people introduced into workgroup
other: Onboarding WG Quarterly Report - https://docs.google.com/document/d/173UxTc38LhXwR6QuJCKpH9CivgMCQhL4jZZXoMOw-nM/edit#heading=h.ybfi2uikflvv, Ambassador Program Onboarding Analysis - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1buAkowcI_kEbycPd_U6nkJeAeryOwYb_o9Nt18dKozc/edit#heading=h.c3dwzdvtnpi1, Ambassador Program Getting Started guide - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1q4dhediWgcbgAP3Wfsky_-roVyfCUe6xi-dhBdHbU4s/edit#heading=h.xtpvv9xicqnq, Onboarding Workgroup Miro Board - https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVM5jyehQ=/?moveToWidget=3458764576645510044&cot=14
Type of meeting: Weekly
People present: Headelf [host], Slate [documenter], Slate, devon, osmium, esewilliams, Rojo, Headelf
Purpose: ACP
Introduction and Tool Discussion
Scribe Appointment - Slate
Slate's Video for ACP
Infographic on SingularityDAO by Devon
Headelf welcomed everyone and discussed the archive tool presented by the workgroup.
Identified challenges in using the tool for meeting notes due to specific sections.
Proposed the role of a scribe to document meeting summaries in the archive tool.
Slate volunteered for the scribe role, having participated in the tool's beta testing
Slate showcased a video on the "Sophiaverse" spin-off project
Headelf sought opinions on the video's content and quality
Positive feedback received; video praised as the best in ACP so far
Devon presented an infographic, discussed its target audience, and raised concerns about design consistency
Slate appointed as the scribe
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Agreed on a payment of $20USD per meeting, subject to change based on time spent
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Suggestions for improvement: Add more subtitles
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Adjust infographic to target the ambassador audience
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Maintain standard color scheme; avoid copying and pasting text
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
[action] Opened a position for a scribe. [assignee] Slate [due] 24 January 2024 [status] done
[action] Consider adding subtitles using YouTube's autogenerated feature [assignee] Slate [due] 31 January 2024 [status] in progress
[action] Explore the video's potential for marketing efforts [assignee] Slate [due] 31 January 2024 [status] in progress
[action] Devon to revise the infographic as per feedback [assignee] devon [due] 31 January 2024 [status] in progress
topics covered: Meeting Summaries, ACP, Videomaking, infographic
emotions: Collaborative
Rojo [facilitator], Guillermo [documenter], Ubio, Curtis, Vasu, Duke, WaKa
The overall purpose of the meeting was to go over the new R&D Guild proposal, the new workgroup operations strategy, and fundamentals for the governance system for the guild.
Discussed the difference and definition of Resaerch, Ideation and Development, and the potential scope of the Guild in relation to ambassadors' needs, and how to approach the different guilds and WorkGroups for further actions.
We continued with the discussion that began in the guild Discord chat about the possible segregation or not into two independent bodies, advantages and disadvantages. The members will present their positions and arguments.
WaKa: I envision **Innovation** [ex-Incubation] providing a range of services to other Ambassador units, according to their needs and our capabilities. These will eventually include analysis of wants and needs, identifying processes, features and benefits, crafting designs and executing development, organizing testing, deployment, training, and support. Ambassador program has a very specific charter and a fixed budget, in most ways separate organization from a dozen and a half projects and organizations under the sNET umbrella. To me, a Guild formed within Ambassadors and applying its budget has an obligation to focus on executing a definitive segment of the overall organizational vision and plan. Providing services according to the needs and the timelines of other groups, while tapping into their budgets, is best delivered by a separate unit, perhaps a financially self-sufficient WorkGroup. Without a clear separation, I do not see bringing more external business or recruiting specific skill sets, as those may not align with Ambassadors' mandate and plan."
Rojo: The R&D initiative is funded based on projects according to the sheet we agreed upon. That means that the ambassador program is funding specific projects with clear outcomes and use cases. Any external endowment, if agreed upon, will also be funding a specific project. Therefore, double rewarding for the same work, or making use of ambassador funds for other entities, cannot happen under this paradigm."
Discussed the different governance systems. For the selection of the proposals to be developed according to the available budget, the possibility of involving the different guilds in the selection was discussed, thus establishing a priority according to the needs of the group.
Discussed the possibility of voting among guild members.
[decision] Guild members agreed that it is beneficial for the whole to maintain the unity of the guild and evaluate reincorporating the 'ideation' functionality as a service for the other guilds and workgroups. This completes the circle with the total capacity of Research, Ideation and Development.
[decision] The use of a template for the standardization of the guild’s proposal submission processes was discussed and approved.
[decision] TBD Final schedule and time slot for guilds weekly meeting.
none
Topics covered: Teamwork, deliverables, respect, scope, flow, tooling, results, trust
How the meeting felt: Fun, Exciting, Collaborative, Productive
Other We miss Fly!
Type of meeting: Biweekly
Present: Stephen [facilitator], Stephen [documenter], André, Vanessa, Stephen, Peter, Slate, Onyeka, Vasu
Working Docs:
[action] Bring to next meeting a list of things that should be included in Governance GitBook update [assignee] Vanessa [due] 7 February 2024 [status] todo
[action] Manually finish archiving all summaries from Nov and Dec 2023, and close the issues for those months so that fund request can be submitted [assignee] Vanessa [due] 7 February 2024 [status] todo
[action] Once November and December 2023 are archived, submit funding requests for those months, and close Q4 2023 Budget issue [assignee] Stephen [due] 21 February 2024 [status] todo
[action] Add bounties to Dework for 4 bounties: 1) Meeting publicity, 2) General Archives publicity; 3) Chasing meeting summaries; 4) Updates to Ambassador GitBook [assignee] Vanessa, Stephen [due] 26 January 2024 [status] done
[action] Draft an approach, with budget, for the Tag Taxonomy work, ready for next meeting on 7th Feb [assignee] Vanessa [due] 7 February 2024 [status] todo
[action] Contact Ubio with brief for his work on LLM tooling [assignee] André [due] 31 January 2024 [status] todo
[action] Core Archives team to meet with Supervisory Council re knowledge management on Fri 26th Jan [assignee] Stephen, Vanessa, André [due] 31 January 2024 [status] todo
topics covered: Tag taxonomy, bounties, monthly archiving, publicity, meeting summary tool, Tool Development, AI tooling, Governance GitBook, mentorship, transition from manual archiving to use of meeting summary tool, Outreach, Knowledge management across the singularityNET ecosystem
emotions: Organised, Discursive, Well-attended, outward-looking
Type of meeting: Weekly
Present: Rojo, Guillermo [facilitator], Guillermo [documenter], Curtis, Vasu, Duke, WaKa, Ubiodee
Purpose: R&D Purpose & Proposal
Working Docs:
The overall purpose of the meeting was to go over the new R&D Guild proposal, the new workgroup operations strategy. Fundamentals for the governance system for the guild.
-Discussed the difference and definition of Resaerch, Ideation and Developemnt and the potential scope of the guild in regards of ambassadors needs and on how to approach the differente guild and groups for further actions.
We continue with the discussion that began in the guild chat about the possible segregation or not into two independent bodies, advantages and disadvantages. The members will present their positions and arguments.
Walter; I envision Innovation [ex-Incubation] providing a range of services to other Ambassador units, according to their needs and our capabilities. These will eventually include analysis of wants and needs, identifying processes, features and benefits, crafting designs and executing development, organizing testing, deployment, training, and support.
Ambassador has a very specific charter and a fixed budget, in most ways separate organization from a dozen and a half projects and organizations under the sNET umbrella. To me, a Guild formed within Ambassadors and applying its budget has an obligation to focus on executing a definitive segment of the overall organizational vision and plan. Providing services according to the needs and the timelines of other groups, while tapping into their budgets, is best delivered by a separate unit, perhaps a financially self-sufficient Workgroup. Without a clear separation, I do not see bringing more external business or recruiting specific skill sets, as those may not align with Ambassadors mandate and plan.
Rojo: The R&D initiative is funded based on projects according to the sheet we agreed upon. That means that the ambassador program is funding specific projects with clear outcomes and use cases. Any external endowment if agreed upon will also be funding a specific project. Therefore double rewarding for the same work, or making use of ambassador funds for other entities cannot happen under this paradigm.
The use of a template for the standardization of the guild’s proposal submission processes was discussed and approved.
Discussed the different governance system For the selection of the proposals to be developed according to the available budget, the possibility of involving the different guilds in the selection was discussed, thus establishing a priority according to the need of the group. The possibility of voting among guild members.
Guild members agreed that it is beneficial for the whole to maintain the unity of the guild and evaluate reincorporating the 'ideation' functionality as a service for the other guilds and WG. This completes the circle with the total capacity of Reasearch, ideation and development.
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
TBD Final schedule and time slot for guilds weekly meeting
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
[action] Next step will be to analyze the team's proposals. to this day we have 10 proposals or ideas in a state of ideation, some of them have the backup of a research and blue print and others are just ideas of potential developments that the different members of the team have developed and shared in the initial document that we have reviewed in this session and will share tomorrow with the tresury guild. Proposals name and description can be found at the GR&D Guilds Propposal. [assignee] Rojo, Guillermo [due] 31 January 2024 [status] done
topics covered: Guilds , Budget , Onboarding, Roles, Tool Development, Proposal, Q1 projections
emotions: Collaborative
Type of meeting: Biweekly
People present: Tevo [host], Tevo [documenter], Tevo, André, Miro, Emotu, Vanessa, Peter, Rojo, William, Headelf, Guilermo, Sucren
Purpose: Structuring Ambassador rules around payments, tasks and anything related to financial activities
Miro board: https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVN8kUlbw=/?moveToWidget=3458764574789806585&cot=10
Transcript: https://app.dework.xyz/singularitynet-ambas/treasury-guild-87240
Working Docs:
Default System Criteria to recognise Core Contributors
Additional options to become a Core contributor
Downsides of differentiating Core contributors
Core Contributors can also be nominated
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
Core Contributors will have a higher weight in the decisions
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
Policy Rules are ratified in the Governance Workgroup
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
Ethical concerns
Education on Staking AGIX
Social effect when staking AGIX
How AGIX staking works and its purpose
Currently, we will not start staking Ambassador Program Reserved AGIX due to ethical concerns
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
How could we lower our budget requests to fit the Ambassador Budget?
How could we improve the Ambassador Program Quarterly Budget Sheet?
Move back to create proposals and budget requests in stable values (USD) and AGIX conversion applied at the ambassador program budget level
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
We will not include a budget for new ideas and potential experiments in Quarter 1
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
[action] Include a new column that links to budget proposals to the Ambassador Program Quarterly Budget Sheet [assignee] Tevo [status] todo
[action] Wait for other workgroups to deliver their budget proposal [due] 8 February 2024 [status] todo
[action] Every workgroup is expected to remove the budget for unplanned items [status] todo
topics covered: Miro Board, Budget , Quarter 1, Staking, Proposals, AGIX, Stable Value, Ethics
emotions: We had quite a tension around discussing the differentiation of core contributors and how it's done
Type of meeting: Weekly
People present: LadyTempestt [host], Onyeka [documenter], Sucren, Vanessa, Peter, esewilliams, Tevo, Cjfrankie, Slate, Precious, Duke, lord kizzy, LadyTempestt
Working Docs:
-Thanks to those who participated in our Continuous onboarding sessions -Onboarding session on the 8th February 2024. -We have more people joining the Onboarding Workgroup and talk on the criterias for you to become a member. -Quarterly Budget Report.
Minutes of last Meeting
Action items from last meeting
Next Ambassador TH Update
Twitter thread on the Getting started channel
Continuous Onboarding Session Report
Onboarding Workgroup Facilitation and Documentation Roster
Q4 Quarterly report
Budget for Q1
We agreed to set a deadline (15th of February) for the Onboarding Session Report.
[opposing] None
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
We decided that the asynchronous input from R&D, Education and Strategy can be added as comments to the Report.
[opposing] None
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
We have decided to create a Twitter tweet to announce our Onboarding session.
[opposing] None
We decided to split the Facilitation of the Onboarding Session into 4 parts
[opposing] None
[action] Sucren to speak to Mikasa to create a tweet to announce the Onboarding session [assignee] Sucren [due] 1 February 2024 [status] todo
[action] Lady Tempestt to create a resource, with ideas for how WGs can support continuous onboarding [assignee] LadyTempestt [due] 1 February 2024 [status] in progress
[action] Vani to make the necessary corrections to the Onboarding Session slides [assignee] Vanessa [due] 1 February 2024 [status] todo
[action] Lord Kizzy to create a report on Continuous Onboarding (1st draft bring to meeting on 15th) [assignee] lord kizzy [due] 15 February 2024 [status] in progress
[action] Lord Kizzy to give the onboarding updates in the next TH meeting [assignee] lord kizzy [due] 30 January 2024 [status] todo
[action] Lord Kizzy to share the infographic to announce the Onboarding session on the 8th of February [assignee] lord kizzy [due] 2024-01-11 [status] todo
GMBLS has been changed to MINS
The Onboarding Session.
The Continuous Onboarding Report
The Question on Guilds and WorkGroups
topics covered: Guilds , Onboarding, TH Update , Roles, Budget
emotions: Collaborative, speedy , funny , Thoughtful , Friendly
Type of meeting: Biweekly
Present: Judith, Jan Horlings [facilitator], Vanessa [documenter], Judith, Jan Horlings, Kenric, Mauro Andreoli, Juana Attieh, Headelf, Megan Hess, Mercy, Mike Lewis, Juan Pablo Barea, Guillermo, Curtis, Newman Lanier, Ubio
Purpose: Improving voting and decison-making
Town Hall Number: 25
Working Docs:
This bi-weekly meeting is an initiative led by the SingularityET Ambassador community. We invite you to be part of our regular event where we share updates, presentations & conversations about topics that relate to Deep Funding and SingularityNET.
topics covered: voting, testing voting behaviours, Deep Funding test round, Community RFPs, RFP, feedback, quadratic voting, Decision Making Process, identity, distributed, platform, Deepfunding proposal platform, proposal platform, voting behavior, strategic, reputation, complex systems, experiment
emotions: analytical, fiery, lively, silencing, complex, heated, passionate, frank, upfront, straightforward, ideas
Type of meeting: Weekly
Present: Rojo [facilitator], Judith [documenter], cardano_class, devon, Dr Strange, Duke, Judith, lord kizzy, malik, Peter, Rojo, Slate, Zalfred
Updates from Task Manager Devon on everybody's outstanding tasks
Slate got welcomed as new video WG member
Updates from Lord Kizzy and Judith on Q4 report and Q1 projections
Updates from Malik (Social Media Management) on social media numbers and that analytics are difficult to get
Is it time to push the Ambassadors Program?
Anwering questions from Zalfred who introduced himself
BGI - people can still apply to go
You will have to assign tasks points yourself to subtasks in Dework (not main tasks)
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
[action] Malik to do research on best social media metrics to track (others can help too) [assignee] malik [due] 2 February 2024 [status] todo
[action] Check at Ambassadors' TH if we should start pushing the program [assignee] Anyone [due] 1 March 1 [status] todo
topics covered: BGI, social media management, Q4 report, Q1 projections, Ambassador Program marketing
emotions: Friendly
Type of meeting: Weekly
Present: Kenichi [facilitator], cjfrankie [documenter], Kenichi, cjfrankie, Mikasa, devon
Kenichi shared his screen for the Scribblers to see the milestones the workgroup has achieved in the last couple of months.
We’re growing indeed and it’s a thing of joy to share it with the Scribblers who have been part of this remarkable journey.
One of the articles that piqued the interest of many individuals is the article written by our very own Mikasa: “AI Cryptography: Enhancing Security and Privacy in the Digital Age."
Good news: our first ever points system will be up and running by the end of this month; scribblers will be rewarded with points as they contribute along the way!
Buildup to the BGI Event is still ongoing. Scribblers are encouraged to tune in; they can also find interesting article suggestions while participating.
Kenichi shared an article suggestion from the CEO of Rejuve.ai, "Using AI and blockchain to target aging", and some interesting updates from Cogito, including a forthcoming Twitter space this Mon 29th Jan with the CEO, Cloris Chen https://twitter.com/CogitoProtocol/status/1750443374304239674
Cjfrankie shared some article suggestions: "AI and Longevity: Unlocking the secrets to prolonged Human Lifespan" and "Digital Dynamo: How AI-Powered Marketing Strategies Catapult Startups to Success".
Our Medium page is growing exponentially. Our goal is to reach the milestone of 1k reads by the end of February 2024.
We set a goal to reach 1k reads on Medium by the end of February 2024.
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
topics covered: Cogito, Points system, BGI 2024 summit, Zealy, Rejuve, Longevity, medium, AI-powered marketing, Marketing, Medium milestones, Beneficial AGI, Weekly updates
emotions: quiet
Intro Who Will Be Attending The Bgi 24 Summit Meeting Summary Tool What Cool Things Will The Tool Enable Us To Do Next How The Tool Works Useful Documentation And Tracking Decisions The Ambassador Role Experiment Who's Tracking Time? Any Strong Objections To Using Governance Workgroup Meetings To Discuss Further? Mental Wellbeing
[decision] Next step will be to analyze the team's proposals. To date, we have 10 proposals or ideas in a state of ideation; some of them have the backup of research and a blueprint, and others are just ideas for potential developments that the different members of the team have developed and shared in the initial document that we have reviewed in this session and will share tomorrow with the Treasury Guild. Proposals' names and descriptions can be found in the GR&D Guilds Proposal:
Sources Research & Development Guild Presentation _ @SingularityNET Ambassador _090124
Research & Development Guild Budget Proposals Sheet _ 100124:
Meeting video:
Deep Funding Town Hall Is A Platform For Community Engagement And Feedback. Test Round Updates And Challenges Encouraging Community To Create Rfps For New Rounds Collecting Feedback On Improving Voting And Decision-making Process What Problem Are We Trying To Solve With This Complex Reputation System, And Is There An Easier Way? Improving Voting And Decision-making Process In The Df Rounds Quadratic Voting Forces Consideration And Constraints On Allocation The Importance Of A Strong Identity System For Decision-making Process. Testing Different Voting Scenarios And Behaviors Importance Of Distributed Identity In Decision-making Process Improving Decision-making Process In Deep Funding Rounds