Week 45
Mon 30th Oct - Sun 5th Nov 2023
Last updated
Mon 30th Oct - Sun 5th Nov 2023
Last updated
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Curtis; Waka; Peter; Headelf [facilitator] [documenter]
Video Education
Headelf shared his Intro video on SNet. 32 sec. Peter shared his Intro video on SNet 1min10sec. Curtis asked about who is the target audience. Discussion followed. WaKa responded to Headelf's inquiry on Google Class with ‘it's a rich full-blown system’. Discussion centered around Peter's more detailed longer video. The balance of the meeting was with Headelf working on editing Peter's video in real time. We replaced stock photos with custom-made by Headelf. Some of the on-the-fly editing left the graphic out of proportion. A long discussion was held about an Outgo video after the intro and the "meat & potatoes". Is a splash for each project possible or needed? Brand assists were raised. WaKa brought up personalized education by AI for individuals.
1 hour 25 minutes.
[Action] Work on a 30-second outgo.
Tevo [facilitator] [documenter]; Andre; Peter; Kenric; Fly; Michael Duncan; Curtis
Aggregating Ambassador Program assets and relevant information under GitBook
https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVM4tvNgs=/?moveToWidget=3458764567917552346&cot=10
https://app.dework.xyz/singularitynet-ambas/process-guild
Discussion Points We are building a place for most relevant community data that is used by Ambassador community Shared an overview of action items that Knowledge Base WG is doing
Decision items: We will include SingularityNET Foundation Phase 2 Token proposal in the GitBook We continue to share Ambassador Program Treasury Rules on GitBook We will include GitHub link of Treasury Manager Decentralised Application in GitBook We will include the form where new members can register their wallet address in the GitBook We will include Dework Link to Treasury Space in the Gitbook We will include link to Treasury Dashboard in the GitBook We will link to Google Folder with all the Ambassador Townhall Slide Decks in GitBook
Action Items We now continue to do more item analysis async - 13.11.23
Discussion Points All workgroups are working on their workgroup onboarding There seems to be less emphasis on Dework Management and how to use it
Topics: Dework, form, analysis, Tokenomics proposal, GitHub, Townhall Slides, Ambassador Gitbook
Sources: Miro Board Article that has link to proposal: https://blog.singularitynet.io/singularitynet-phase-two-massive-token-utilization-toward-decentralized-beneficial-agi-6e3ac5a5b44a Treasury Management Rules: https://snet-ambassadors.gitbook.io/home/group-1/treasury-management Treasury DApp Source Code: https://github.com/treasuryguild/treasury-dapp Wallet Collector: https://forms.gle/xqEoAB26tDCsw7789 Treasury Guild Dework Space: https://app.dework.xyz/singularitynet-ambas/treasury-guild-87240 Treasury Dashboard: https://treasuryguild.com/Singularity%20Net Ambassador Townhall Slide Folder: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1kO6GuiDW2HO5lUTPsO_cZXQws_HzLwU0?usp=drive_link
Feelings: Meeting felt busy as we went through different individually analyzed items
Not this week
00:00 Introduction by Peter 00:12 Participants Intro 01:38 Mentions 05:48 Workgroup Updates 13:00 Quarter 4 Budget 22:25 Video workgroup Monthly Updates 46:25 Voting Experiment by Felix 54:25 Governance Discussion by WaKa 01:01:02 Welcoming Session for DeepFunding Round 3 awarded teams 01:02:20 Conclusion by Peter
No summary given
Meeting cancelled
Not this week
meetings suspended pending reorganisation of the guild
Headelf, Rojo, Fly, Curtis, Tuso, Peter [summarizer]
Progressing the roundtable document, so it can be shared to a wider audience https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uD2MR1DoexRiYXX-ATrhOfS7SihyPKX_Te1mJpeOoEM/edit
[Decision]: Post in strategy channel, tagging all workgroup leaders for their input before putting it to full community input. [Decision]: the RT will be required to participate in program wide votes. They will NOT have additional voting power compared to other members.
[Action]: Work a-sync to expand the document
Peter [Facilitator]; Love [Documenter]; Sucre n Spice; Vani; Nwobi
Minutes from the last meeting Paying LilyCupcake for more of a “timeless” version of the onboarding video. Imagery in the onboarding video. The payment structure for Onboarding WG Onboarding WG tag and who's going to give the tag to respective members in Discord. The kind of proof to show for engagement and onboarding of new members to the SNET ambassador program. Continuous Onboarding (How to support other WGs in onboarding new members to their meetings and more). Giving a short survey form for people to express how they feel about the onboarding process.
[Decision] We agreed that people can only apply for tasks in the Onboarding Dework if they have the “Onboarding workgroup member” tag in Discord as the Onboarding Dework space is now only accessible to people with the tag. [Decision] We agreed to submit proof of DM-TO-DM onboarding and engagement with new members of the SNET ambassador program fortnightly or weekly so proof of fund request will not be required.
[Action] Sucre to tweak the scripts and relay the imagery in the onboarding video to LilyCupcake. [Action] Peter to give every member of the onboarding WG the onboarding WG role on Discord. [Action] Vani and LordKizzy to make the 1st draft for the onboarding survey and bring it to the next meeting.
Giving screenshots or something tangible for every engagement and onboarding of new members done by Sucre might compromise people’s privacy.
We should try reinforcing the onboarding messages on how to get involved in a particular WG(e.g. In the onboarding WG, all you need to do is show up for meetings) in order to get a clear and concise message across to new/old members.
Check Getting Started doc - (15 mins) Have any new comments been added? Turning it into a Twitter thread as suggested by Peter - this was to stay on the agenda for decision in a future meeting.
We should reach out to other WGs and ask for a bit of their time during their meetings to find out how they onboard new/old members to their meetings while explaining things from our perspectives
Topics covered: Onboarding, Dework, Privacy, Survey, Collaboration, Permissions, Video. Sources:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p2u-GhdK6cVCS6TmU2ME2G5WbtEIOzSxSVpGHC0fzbQ/edit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fYx3CXgT-NGi19TmBUxS3lTMu93Hx68cpGST8TED9cA/edit
How the meeting felt: Funny, Contributive, Thoughtful.
Tevo [facilitator] [documenter]; Andre; Peter; Love; Rojo; Vani; Headelf; Kenichi; Sucre n Spice
How to structure Ambassador rules around payments, tasks and anything related to financial activities?
https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVM7pbrKE=/?moveToWidget=3458764567368822168&cot=10
https://app.dework.xyz/singularitynet-ambas/treasury-guild-87240
Decision items Archival WG September Budget is approved Action Items Create a project management item instead of including the costs of project management under a meeting item - for November Fund Request Discussion Points How our differences of work recognition models trigger scrutiny, based on what information we build trust? How to have clarity on workgroup objectives.
Decision items Each workgroup and team justifies their next quarterly budget Discussion Points Should we have a focus group auditing budget?
Decision items Only Ambassadors and workgroup leads can propose and vote on treasury proposals The proposal must align with the Ambassadors Program's mission and goals. Proposals will undergo a review period of 14 days or until 80% of all ambassadors or workgroup leads have voted Proposals will be subject to a community vote. A majority vote of 51% of those who vote is required for approval. Approved budgets will allow the withdrawal of funds up until the quarterly limit Each Workgroup is expected to produce a Quarterly Report Withdrawals are made as Dework Bounties or Fund Requests We continue to use Swarm Treasury System to distribute rewards
Share Quarter 4 Treasury Proposal in Townhall - 07.11.23
We updated Workgroup Budget Limits
Topics: Budget, Audit, Proposal, Quarter 4, Planning, Archival, Fund Request, Miro Board
Sources: Quarter 4 Treasury Proposal - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZFfc4swKSN25XQC3hJVeiEEjbzXs8_xz3bM0JwmFzQ0/edit Workgroup Types and Requirements - https://drive.google.com/file/d/11xaV3oG_NSJ4SpbXZiZE8JjbwyJwbCUD/view Task Submission Template - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NYqDGtvbLqFXg8AMd4qujP7SX3RGmkMzTfSdvjyblFc/edit?usp=sharing Archival WG September Fund Request - https://github.com/orgs/SingularityNET-Archive/projects/1/views/4?sliceBy%5Bvalue%5D=September+2023 How the meeting felt: Meeting was collaborative and focused on topics that helped to align and improve our distribution rules.
Not this week
Mihai Bărbulescu; jay.05 | Judith W; headelf; Peter E; Tevo; Fly; Rojo; Kenichi.
It should be kept. From there people can chose workgroups: Writing, Video or Outreach
It makes sense to have a body that's collaborating with writers WG, video WG and outreach roles
Risk: Are we micromanaging too much?
Who would lead the Outreach/Marketing Guild? Fly, who has been leading it, isn't inside the workgroups but wants to contribute but not lead it
Weekly meetings might not be needed. Meetings could be scheduled when needed only.
How many people will be needed for the outreach role? 2 might be good to start with
Stay on top with events happening across SNet and understand what's happening in the next months
Outreach to spin-off projects to find out how we can support them/ what we can create for them
Decide what the main marketing focus should be
Communicate to each workgroup what content needs to go out
Make sure the workgroups are communicating (They have alignment on what content goes out)
Outreach to external organisations that could collaborate with SNet
Social media coordination between workgroup content ,especially Writers' and Video WG
Amplifying messages on social media from the whole ecosystem
It makes sense to create more content about the other spin-off projects
Risk: Too many tweets /too spammy - people will mute?
What do people want to see on Twitter?Are they here for Ambassador program updates or SNet project updates?
How do we decide what's being posted in the sea of content in the SNet ecosystem? There are so many projects, it's challenging to amplify every message.
How can they request a task?
Should they create their tasks in Dework for us? Do they know how to use Dework? (Will need to get feedback from them)
Should we have the outreach role coordinators get the info from projects on what tasks are needed and create the tasks for them? (Could be very time consuming!)
We could offer a Google doc template for them to input task info. We can then turn it into Dework task for them.
Should workgroups decide on the pricing for each task, or should we have standardised rates, or should the spin-off projects themselves decide what they want to pay?
Charging a service fee to cover SNet costs is definitely needed ( treasury etc): Proposed: 5-10% charge
What currency should it be charged in? Their token or AGIX?
How do we establish a point of contact? Invite them to Town Hall session or outreach by an individual person with an outreach role?
Should we reach out with a defined offer/service? Risk: It will restrict their creativity to come up with what they truly need.
Should we ask them what exactly they need? Risk: We shouldn't bend for them. They might ask for things we can’t offer
Translation
Video production
Writing
Outreach to establish external partner leads/relationships
Town Hall hosting service w/ Breakout room
Developers (If we have capacity)
Process modelling / Process maps (If Tevo has capacity)
Take meeting notes / produce meeting summaries
Create documentation
Help them set up or manage their own Ambassadors program:
Full Ambassador’s package/ Consultations (Treasury, Dework, Note taking…)
We need more time to ideate on each item, discussion will continue next Friday 12 UTC In the meantime: create a Google doc to continue brainstorming (See action items)
Judith to create a Google document where we can continue brainstorming collaboratively on:
Who are the points of contacts for each spinoff project?
What questions do we want to ask them?
What responsibilities should a person with the ‘outreach role’ have?
What workgroups want to offer their services?
What services could we potentially offer?
This document is at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZO_n95IvOje7HFUYFjrl9TN9Qr_Jh7k8W3FRCi1pLLQ/edit
RafaelJeff, LadyTempestt, CJfrankie, Judith, Devon Hardy, Kenichi [facilitator], Slate [documenter]
recap of previous tasks task experiences updates on ongoing tasks upcoming articles collaboration Twitter thread management upcoming trivia session the need for infographics for Zealy substack article suggestions and December articles scribblers as note-takers for other groups article editing Greasury problem resolution
Kenichi opened the meeting by providing a recap of the tasks from the previous session. This ensured that everyone was on the same page regarding ongoing assignments.
LadyTempestt shared a positive experience with her first task, underscoring the importance of task fulfillment and collaboration within the group.
Judith reported that she was taking her time with her current task, as it lacked urgency and a strict time limit. Kenichi offered his guidance and support for her ongoing work.
The team discussed plans for working on articles with added events. This suggests a focus on providing timely and engaging content for readers.
Members were encouraged to actively engage in collaborative work. They were advised to post in the Discord channel for help or resources, demonstrating a commitment to mutual support and growth.
Mikasa was identified as the point of contact for managing Twitter threads. Members were encouraged to reach out for guidance or assistance in this regard.
A trivia session is scheduled for this Friday (today), which will focus on topics related to SingularityNET, deepfunding, and AI. Prizes were announced : The first-place winner receives $20, the second-place winner receives $10, and the third-place winner receiving $5. Additionally, the fourth to forward positions would receive Zealy points.
Judith and CJFrankie volunteered to create infographics for Zealy, a valuable contribution to visual content.
A notable article by LadyTempestt was discussed, and members were encouraged to show their appreciation by giving claps, highlighting the importance of supporting each other's work.
The group discussed updates on subscribers and [decision] set a goal of reaching 60 subscribers. Additionally, it was mentioned that there are numerous articles in the pipeline waiting to be published, suggesting a robust content creation schedule.
December Articles: LadyTempestt suggested the proactive creation of extra articles for December. This idea stems from the understanding that many members are likely to be on holiday during this period.
Kenichi proposed an intriguing concept - scribblers attending other people's meetings and taking notes. The Treasury Guild notetaker role was identified as open, providing an opportunity for participation and involvement.
In the last 15 minutes of the meeting, Kenichi shared an article link related to an editing session, ensuring that the group stays informed and connected.
Kenichi provided the important update that the treasury problem had been resolved, and tasks would be rewarded the following Tuesday. This underscores the commitment to transparency and accountability within the group.
[action] Participate in the upcoming trivia session. (To Do) [action] Create infographics for Zealy. [action] Continue working on pending articles. [action] Consider additional articles for December. [action] Encourage and explore the possibility of Scribblers attending other meetings and taking notes. [action] Updates on articles (Next week).
Rojo [facilitator], Judith [documentor], Peter. E, headelf, OEP, lord_kizzy, Kenichi
Discussed Workgroup videos that have recently been posted
Discussed ways to improve the appeal of our current videos for example: adding a headline to our videos, adding auto caption, changing the background, and discussed the best placement for those video elements
Discussed additional task requirements to add to Dework to make the task instruction clearer and ensure a higher standard of videos (additional task requirements: auto-caption, headline, solid background)
Discussed the idea of having a Q&A document with solutions to the most commonly asked questions by our members (many members are asking questions in DMs -> the answers get lost / need to be repeated)
Discussed whether or not we should have the announced video optimization workshop as an interactive workshop or as a written cheat sheet
[decision] To start adding a main caption (headline) to our videos to let people know what they are watching (also as a hook to get people to stop scrolling) [decision] Instead of extending the blurred background to fit the whole frame of the video we will add a solid colour background (there we will place the auto caption and headline) [decision] To brainstorm a suitable headline for the Town Hall summary videos [decision] To add more info/requirements to Dework task description eg. auto-captions, headline caption, and solid background if applicable [decision] All videos should have auto-captions without exception because many people watch videos without sound [decision] To make a Q&A document with the most common problems of workgroup members and their solutions and share it in the video group and then add it to our Carrd page [decision] To always proof-read auto-captions to avoid mistakes [decision] To add sound to the Town Hall summary video ( we will trial this) [decision] To show the headline in the video thumbnail [decision] To ask workgroup members if they would prefer the announced video optimization workshop as an online workshop or document
[action] Add additional task requirements to Dework: auto-captions that will be proof-read, solid background (if video doesn't fit the full frame), headline/ video caption to add context to videos [action] To share a Q&A document in the workgroup chat where members can ask their most common questions, they will then be answered and the document will be shared to our Carrd page (or pinned to the group chat) [action] To add sound to the next Town Hall summary video (give it a try first before we make it a requirement) [action] Ask members in the group if they prefer the announced video workgroup as an online workshop or as a cheat-sheet document [action] Brainstorm catchy headline for Town Hall summary videos
Topics covered: Dework, Town Hall Summary, Auto Captions, Video Caption (Headline), Video Background, Q&A, Most common problems/questions, Video Edit Improvements
Sources: Video WorkGroup's Carrd: https://vw-snetambassadors.carrd.co/
How the meeting felt: Productive, friendly, collaborative, action oriented, problem-solving mindset, great engagement from everyone
\
