Week 6
Mon 5th Feb - Sunday 11th Feb
Last updated
Mon 5th Feb - Sunday 11th Feb
Last updated
Type of meeting: Weekly
Present: Peter [facilitator], Vanessa [documenter], Peter, Curtis, Guillermo, hogantuso, Judith, Kinga, Rojo, Vanessa, WaKa, Will Tatz
Town Hall Number: 84
The Ambassador Town Hall is a recurring event happening live on the Ambassador Zoom channel https://www.youtube.com/@SNET_Ambassador each Tuesday at 19:00 UTC.
00:00 Introduction By Peter 01:24 Mentions 02:56 Ambassador Role Progress 19:36 Supervisory Council Updates By Grace 20:26 Challenges Faced By The Supervisory Council 23:35 Blueprint Set-up 26:55 Lead Writer Announcement 28:30 Knowledge Management Organization 33:00 Additional Comments By Daniel 35:05 What Does Success Look Like? 43:25 Q&a 47:40 Difference Between Problems And Solutions: The Ambassador Program Is A Solution, But Is It The Right One? 1:17:40 Ending
topics covered: the Ambassador role, experiment, Governance, Supervisory Council, Decentralisation Blueprint, Decentralization, Decentralization Blueprint, Decentralisation, Lead Writer, Knowledge management across the singularityNET ecosystem, Knowledge management, keeping informed, blogpost, community engagement, Google Docs, GitBook, useful documentation, Value of Ambassador Program, Purpose of Ambassador Program
emotions: interesting, informative, insightful, analytical
Meeting was cancelled
Type of meeting: Biweekly
Present: Tevo [facilitator], Tevo [documenter], Tevo, André, Peter, lord kizzy
Purpose: Aggregating Ambassador Program assets and relevant information under GitBook
Meeting video: https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVN-9yivE=/?moveToWidget=3458764574355478962&cot=10
Miro board: https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVN-9yivE=/?moveToWidget=3458764574355478962&cot=10
Other media: https://app.dework.xyz/singularitynet-ambas/process-guild
Working Docs:
Going over feedback questions and rationale
We put the Feedback form into the test
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
[action] Review feedback next meeting [status] todo
[action] Decide on rewards at the next meeting [status] todo
Should "Continuous Onboarding Report - Google Doc" be on the GitBook?
Include "sNET Onboarding session - Google Slides" in the GitBook
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
Include "SNET Onboarding WG Task Reward Sheet - Google Sheet" in the GitBook
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
Should "SingularityNET Ambassador Program rewards - Google Sheet" be on the GitBook?
Should "SingularityNET Treasury Distributions Export - Google sheet" be on the GitBook?
Include "Proposal Framework for Role proposals - Google Doc" in the GitBook
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
Include "Quarterly Workgroup Budget Calculator - Google Sheet" in the GitBook
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
Include "SingularityNET Phase Two: Massive Token Utilization Toward Decentralized Beneficial AGI - Article" in the GitBook
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
Include "Treasury Guild Proposal" in the GitBook
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
Include "WG quarterly report: Treasury Guild - Google Doc" in the GitBook
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
[action] Import 2022 rewards on "SingularityNET Treasury Distributions Export - Google sheet" into Treasury Manager [assignee] Tevo [status] todo
Include "Voting / Consensus / Consent / Decision making in Ambassador Program - Miro Board" in the GitBook
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
Include "Workgroup Types and Requirements Matrix Table - PDF" in the GitBook
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
Include "Requirements to propose a Workgroup Space for Ambassador Program - Google Doc" in the GitBook
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
Include "Requirements to propose a Program for Ambassador Program - Google Doc" in the GitBook
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
Include "Dework PBL Q1 Proposal = Google Doc" in the GitBook
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
topics covered: Feedback Form, Onboarding Slides, Budget Request, Role Proposal Requirements, Quarterly Budget Calculator, SingularityNET Phase Two Proposal, Proposal, Quarterly Report, Reward Data, Decision Making Process, Workgroup Proposal Requirements, Ambassador GitBook, Miro Board
emotions: Session items reviewing moved slowly as we had disagreements in many items and required discussions
other: Stopped including workgroup assets used in Summary due to huge number of files
Type of meeting: Weekly
Present: Peter, Slate [facilitator], Slate [documenter], Slate, osmium, malik, duke peter, Peter, esewilliams, Will Tatz
Purpose: ACP Video/Infographics and Setting Up Quizzes
Other media: Link
Ambassador Certification Program Video by Osmium about Mindplex
Ambassador Certification Program Infographic by Ese Williams about Awakening - Health
Ambassador Certification Program Infographic by Will Tatz about SNET
Ambassador Certification Program Infographic by Devon about SingularityDAO
Will asked Slate if he can accept his Friend reqest on Discord and explain to him the process of making his video as it seemed ideal for Ambassador Certification Program
Osmium's video for Ambassador Certification Program on Mindplex was previewed by every participant for feedback
On Osmium's video,WIll suggested: Needs to review other videos created by the members to get more idea of the overall video quality and making
On Osmium's Video : EseWilliams suggested text is slightly more and that she needs more time to read each slide before it gets changed, so suggested to increase the time duration of each slide
On Osmium's video, Malik suggested to lessen text . Peter : the heading "What" is missing
Then Ese Williams shared her infographic on Awakening - Health and asked for feedback
On Ese Williams infographic : Slate suggested to add "What" heading
On Ese Williams infographic The suggestions were: Peter The "What" reads more like a "why" Slate: Using the standard template design Slate: Robot pic is needed Peter: Include Meditation element of the robot Peter : "Where" has repetition
Will shared his infographic on SNET. Slate: It highlight the main 1 or 2 people who initially made the project come forward Slate: Need to put all the information into the Canva template that is being used for infographics
Devon : discuss the infographic with Headelf, async or maybe next meeting
Osmium to rework his video
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Will and Ese to put their infographics into the Canva template
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
[action] Rework and work on feedbacks given to each participants for their infographics and videos [assignee] everyone assigned [due] 13 February 2024 [status] in progress
[action] Post the meeting summary [assignee] Slate [due] 4 February 2024 [status] done
topics covered: Meeting Summaries, ACP, Videomaking, infographic, quizzes
emotions: Collaborative, contructive criticism
Type of meeting: Biweekly
Present: Stephen [facilitator], Stephen [documenter], André, Vanessa, Stephen, Slate, Onyeka
Meeting video: Link
Working Docs:
[action] Bring to next meeting a list of things that should be included in Governance GitBook update [assignee] Vanessa [due] 7 February 2024 [status] todo
[action] Manually finish archiving all summaries from Nov and Dec 2023, and close the issues for those months so that fund request can be submitted [assignee] Vanessa [due] 7 February 2024 [status] todo
[action] Once November and December 2023 are archived, submit funding requests for those months, and close Q4 2023 Budget issue [assignee] Stephen [due] 21 February 2024 [status] todo
[action] Draft an approach, with budget, for the Tag Taxonomy work, ready for next meeting on 7th Feb - done, and was agreed in this meeting, see https://github.com/SingularityNET-Archive/SingularityNET-Archive/issues/87 [assignee] Vanessa [due] 7 February 2024 [status] done
[action] Contact Ubio with brief for his work on LLM tooling - done, and agreed. Ubio will submit updates via the Issues called "Tool development: Ubio" [assignee] André [due] 31 January 2024 [status] done
[action] Core Archives team to meet with Supervisory Council re knowledge management on Fri 26th Jan - done, meeting was useful and discussions are ongoing on how we can best support knowledge management, especially around the Decentralisation Blueprint doc [assignee] Stephen, Vanessa, André [due] 26 January 2024 [status] done
[action] André to create a markdown template for correction of existing monthly GitBook records [assignee] André [due] 7 February 2024 [status] in progress
topics covered: Tag taxonomy, bounties, monthly archiving, publicity, meeting summary tool, Tool Development, AI tooling, Governance GitBook, mentorship, transition from manual archiving to use of meeting summary tool, Outreach, Knowledge management across the singularityNET ecosystem
emotions: Organised, Discursive, Well-attended, outward-looking
Type of meeting: Weekly
Present: Rojo, WaKa [facilitator], Guillermo [documenter], malik
Purpose: R&D Objectives & Budget Final Adjustments
The overall purpose of the meeting was to go over the new R&D Guild list of proposed projects on the pipeline and to discuss the beter approach for development. Members present talked about their calendar and schedule availability to organize tasks and the coordinated effort of the task force
We discussed and agreed on final changes on budget to be presented on Feb 080224 Discussed, agreed and vote on operation structure and members contributors fees established to follow Ambassadors standards of $10 per Hour.
We discussed specific criteria for development strategy and tools to implement on the development.
We discussed and the members have reached an agreement on the operational budget allocation sving budget for development of tools and proposals.
Team members presented details of roadmaps for each proposal and members started showing their interest in participating on one or the other, this way we were able to build teams and start discussing tasks.
On Governance; members discussed how to move forward and present community proposals on next Q. Members have found an agreement on engaging other guilds on next Q to present their proposals and bring constructive feedback to pulish the blueprints and pulish the outcome.
AGIX Price $0.27 Q1 Total Estimated Cost in US Dollars $7,300 Q1 Total Estimated Cost in AGIX 27,037
Budget needed for final adjustments to fit all projects proposed by guilds members needs, this will be conducted by leading members and presented for final approval on future teasury meeting.
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
[action] Budget Fitting and adjustments for final approval at next treasuty call [assignee] Rojo, Guillermo [due] 12 January 2024 [status] done
topics covered: Guilds , Budget , Tool Development, Proposal, Q1 projections, Quarter 1, AI tooling
emotions: Collaborative, productive
Type of meeting: Biweekly
Present: Tevo [facilitator], Tevo [documenter], Tevo, Vanessa, Peter, Rojo, William, Guilermo
Purpose: Structuring Ambassador rules around payments, tasks and anything related to financial activities
Meeting video: https://youtu.be/ZSofwygwiDU
Miro board: https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVN8kUlbw=/?moveToWidget=3458764574789806585&cot=10
Transcript: https://app.dework.xyz/singularitynet-ambas/treasury-guild-87240
Other media: https://youtu.be/HNvBpBYv68o
When and how should we create the list of contributors?
Creation of the First Core Contributor lists will be a manual operations
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
[action] Document a Clear list of rules to create the contributor list [status] todo
[action] Create a contributor list based on those rules [assignee] Tevo [status] todo
Why are we going through proposal requests and trying to expect workgroups to adjust their budgets?
Who are objecting to fitted budget results?
Assessing workgroup budget requests
enforce high-cost budget requests to reduce rewards by thousands
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
Translation WG Q1 Estimated budget request was changed from 2700$ to 1400$ and approved
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
Governance WG Q1 Estimated budget request was changed from 1350$ to 400$ and approved
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
New Ideas Budget % was increased from 0% to 2% to reflect the already rewarded Gamers Guild Q1 budget
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
Gamers Guild Q1 budget request was changed from 1900$ to 1050$ and approved
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
Strategy Guild Budget request was not approved
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
Education Guild Budget request was not approved
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
The R&D Guild Budget request was not approved
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
[action] Update the Budget Calculator Document with reasons or sources why the request is not approved [assignee] Tevo [status] done
[action] Explain Gamers Guild budget request changes to Gamer Guild leads [assignee] Tevo [status] done
topics covered: Miro Board, Budget , Quarter 1, Proposals, Quarterly Budget Calculator, core contributors
other: As always expecting reducing rewards and stepping to people's toes brings up heated discussions, but I feel like we made quite some good progress on the meeting
Type of meeting: Weekly
Present: All Members [facilitator], Peter [documenter], SucrenSpice, Peter, Vanessa, lord kizzy, LadyTempestt, duke peter
Working Docs:
Our regular meeting was replaced by an open Onboarding session for new people, including a Q&A.
The session was not videoed
[rationale] because the content was very similar to the previous Onboarding session here https://youtu.be/5gnF2Q2qLS0?si=V4AV3pIwdwQ-fgxW
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
[action] Notes were taken of the questions asked, and we will decide in our next meeting whether any of them need to be added to the Getting Started Discord channel as FAQ. [status] todo
Deciding on whether to add any new FAQs to Getting Started channel
topics covered: Onboarding, workgroups, the Ambassador role, Decision Making Process, Engagement, Getting Started
emotions: engaging new people, participatory, well organised
Type of meeting: Biweekly
Present: Jan Horlings, Judith [facilitator], Vanessa [documenter], Mercy, Joshua, Mohammed, Rafael Cardoso, Rojo, Kenn, Guillermo, Kenric Nelson, Seira, Ammar, Musonda Bemba, Mauro Andreoli
Purpose: Offering a space for proposers in Deep Funding round 3 to present their proposals
This week's Town Hall was replaced by a Deep Funding Spotlight Day, with presentations from proposers in Deep Funding round 3.
0:00 Intro 0:31 Df Spotlight Day Presentation By Judith 4:06 Deep Funding Test Round Updates By Jan 7:30 Breakout Room # 1 1:20:53 Breakout Room # 2
topics covered: DeepFunding, Deep funding round 3
Type of meeting: Weekly
Present: hogantuso [facilitator], devon [documenter], cardano_class, lord kizzy, malik, Zalfred, killy, Rojo
Purpose: The main purpose of the meeting was to discuss the Video Suggestion Sheet, focusing on whether we need to form partnerships for creating video content.
Malik, as a social media manager, regularly updated about video upload statuses.
Rojo and Judith's recommendations for videos were brought up during the meeting.
Lord Kizzy, as the task manager, gave weekly task updates.
Kizzy discussed the deadline for Lily's and Cardano class's townhall video submissions.
A discussion took place regarding the video suggestion sheet.
Tuso discussed the process of pairing members for suggested video.
Rojo discussed that whether members should pair up before making a suggestion, or they should pair up after a video has been suggested.
Rojo mentioned that there is a budget for only 4 long videos.
OEP stated that pairing should ensure that everyone has the opportunity to participate in the video production process.
Malik will conduct an analysis of the views and likes, subsequently providing an update to the workgroup regarding these metrics.
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Pairing of members for the suggested video.
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
[action] Performing an analysis of video metrics across various social media platforms. [assignee] malik [status] in progress
topics covered: social media management, workgroup updates, video suggestion sheet
emotions: Friendly, Collaborative, Thoughtful , speedy
Type of meeting: Weekly
Present: Kenichi [facilitator], Mikasa [documenter], Kenichi, Mikasa, cjfrankie, devon, Gorga Siagian, hogantuso, LadyTempestt, Precious Asuquo, Slate
Kenichi suggested the tool Wudpecker (https://www.wudpecker.io/) to record our meetings for more accuracy.
Dework updates: Slate gave an update on the Cogito article "Enhancing Security: The Role of Machine Learning in Risk Mitigation".
Cj Frankie gave an update on his task on Dework; he’ll have a submission by Saturday (10th Feb) evening.
There were corrections to be made to a few articles written by members of the workgroup.
LadyTempestt raised questions about the points system task on Dework. Kenichi explained that the points system is used to track the efforts and contribution to the workgroup, not the time contributed to completing tasks.
Kenichi made awareness regarding the Substack newsletter as a recurring task. The substack newsletter is an article/blogpost containing all the guilds' and workgroups' meetings summary for the week. There was discussion on ways to assign Scribblers to the Substack newsletter task.
Onboarding new members: Precious was given introduction into the workgroup, and the test was also shared. Good luck, Precious!
the note-taker ai from Wudpecker (https://www.wudpecker.io/) will be integrated into our next meeting
[rationale] To inprove accuracy
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
For the Substack task, the Scribbler assigned for the week will assign a different Scribbler for the following week.
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
[action] Kenichi will send the WG's budget proposal to Treasury today: this funding will be used to incentivize our points system and the weekly trivia session - Done. See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jvQ4DfJd6WYsYdZORg8t4g3Dsft88guYno7bxWIMsVQ/edit?usp=sharing [assignee] Kenichi [due] 2 February 2024 [status] done
[action] Cj Frankie will make a submission for his task on Dework before Monday 12th Feb [assignee] cjfrankie [due] 12 February 2024 [status] todo
[action] Lady Tempestt and Slate will make proper corrections to their articles. [assignee] LadyTempestt, Slate [due] 16 February 2024 [status] todo
topics covered: Substack, new people, new members, corrections, points system, Dework, Onboarding, cohort edit session, Wudpecker, AI summaries, useful documentation, Meeting Summaries, Cogito, security, machine learning, risk mitigation, tracking, contribution
emotions: calm, interactive