Week 6

Mon 5th Feb - Sunday 11th Feb

Monday 5th February 2024

Tuesday 6th February 2024

Ambassador Town Hall

  • Type of meeting: Weekly

  • Present: Peter [facilitator], Vanessa [documenter], Peter, Curtis, Guillermo, hogantuso, Judith, Kinga, Rojo, Vanessa, WaKa, Will Tatz

  • Town Hall Number: 84

Timestamped video:

The Ambassador Town Hall is a recurring event happening live on the Ambassador Zoom channel https://www.youtube.com/@SNET_Ambassador each Tuesday at 19:00 UTC.

00:00 Introduction By Peter 01:24 Mentions 02:56 Ambassador Role Progress 19:36 Supervisory Council Updates By Grace 20:26 Challenges Faced By The Supervisory Council 23:35 Blueprint Set-up 26:55 Lead Writer Announcement 28:30 Knowledge Management Organization 33:00 Additional Comments By Daniel 35:05 What Does Success Look Like? 43:25 Q&a 47:40 Difference Between Problems And Solutions: The Ambassador Program Is A Solution, But Is It The Right One? 1:17:40 Ending

Keywords/tags:

  • topics covered: the Ambassador role, experiment, Governance, Supervisory Council, Decentralisation Blueprint, Decentralization, Decentralization Blueprint, Decentralisation, Lead Writer, Knowledge management across the singularityNET ecosystem, Knowledge management, keeping informed, blogpost, community engagement, Google Docs, GitBook, useful documentation, Value of Ambassador Program, Purpose of Ambassador Program

  • emotions: interesting, informative, insightful, analytical

Governance Workgroup

Meeting was cancelled

Wednesday 7th February 2024

Knowledge Base Workgroup

  • Type of meeting: Biweekly

  • Present: Tevo [facilitator], Tevo [documenter], Tevo, André, Peter, lord kizzy

  • Purpose: Aggregating Ambassador Program assets and relevant information under GitBook

  • Meeting video: https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVN-9yivE=/?moveToWidget=3458764574355478962&cot=10

  • Miro board: https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVN-9yivE=/?moveToWidget=3458764574355478962&cot=10

  • Other media: https://app.dework.xyz/singularitynet-ambas/process-guild

  • Working Docs:

Agenda item 1 - Onboarding Feedback Form - [resolved]

Discussion Points:

  • Going over feedback questions and rationale

Decision Items:

  • We put the Feedback form into the test

    • [effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup

Action Items:

  • [action] Review feedback next meeting [status] todo

  • [action] Decide on rewards at the next meeting [status] todo

Agenda item 2 - Review Onboarding Workgroup Items - [resolved]

Discussion Points:

  • Should "Continuous Onboarding Report - Google Doc" be on the GitBook?

Decision Items:

  • Include "sNET Onboarding session - Google Slides" in the GitBook

    • [effect] mayAffectOtherPeople

  • Include "SNET Onboarding WG Task Reward Sheet - Google Sheet" in the GitBook

    • [effect] mayAffectOtherPeople

Agenda item 3 - Review Treasury Guild Items - [resolved]

Discussion Points:

  • Should "SingularityNET Ambassador Program rewards - Google Sheet" be on the GitBook?

  • Should "SingularityNET Treasury Distributions Export - Google sheet" be on the GitBook?

Decision Items:

  • Include "Proposal Framework for Role proposals - Google Doc" in the GitBook

    • [effect] mayAffectOtherPeople

  • Include "Quarterly Workgroup Budget Calculator - Google Sheet" in the GitBook

    • [effect] mayAffectOtherPeople

  • Include "SingularityNET Phase Two: Massive Token Utilization Toward Decentralized Beneficial AGI - Article" in the GitBook

    • [effect] mayAffectOtherPeople

  • Include "Treasury Guild Proposal" in the GitBook

    • [effect] mayAffectOtherPeople

  • Include "WG quarterly report: Treasury Guild - Google Doc" in the GitBook

    • [effect] mayAffectOtherPeople

Action Items:

  • [action] Import 2022 rewards on "SingularityNET Treasury Distributions Export - Google sheet" into Treasury Manager [assignee] Tevo [status] todo

Agenda item 4 - Review Process Guild Items - [resolved]

Decision Items:

  • Include "Voting / Consensus / Consent / Decision making in Ambassador Program - Miro Board" in the GitBook

    • [effect] mayAffectOtherPeople

  • Include "Workgroup Types and Requirements Matrix Table - PDF" in the GitBook

    • [effect] mayAffectOtherPeople

  • Include "Requirements to propose a Workgroup Space for Ambassador Program - Google Doc" in the GitBook

    • [effect] mayAffectOtherPeople

  • Include "Requirements to propose a Program for Ambassador Program - Google Doc" in the GitBook

    • [effect] mayAffectOtherPeople

Agenda item 5 - Review Dework PBL Workgroup Items - [resolved]

Decision Items:

  • Include "Dework PBL Q1 Proposal = Google Doc" in the GitBook

    • [effect] mayAffectOtherPeople

Keywords/tags:

  • topics covered: Feedback Form, Onboarding Slides, Budget Request, Role Proposal Requirements, Quarterly Budget Calculator, SingularityNET Phase Two Proposal, Proposal, Quarterly Report, Reward Data, Decision Making Process, Workgroup Proposal Requirements, Ambassador GitBook, Miro Board

  • emotions: Session items reviewing moved slowly as we had disagreements in many items and required discussions

  • other: Stopped including workgroup assets used in Summary due to huge number of files

Education Workgroup

  • Type of meeting: Weekly

  • Present: Peter, Slate [facilitator], Slate [documenter], Slate, osmium, malik, duke peter, Peter, esewilliams, Will Tatz

  • Purpose: ACP Video/Infographics and Setting Up Quizzes

  • Other media: Link

In this meeting we discussed:

  • Ambassador Certification Program Video by Osmium about Mindplex

  • Ambassador Certification Program Infographic by Ese Williams about Awakening - Health

  • Ambassador Certification Program Infographic by Will Tatz about SNET

  • Ambassador Certification Program Infographic by Devon about SingularityDAO

Discussion Points:

  • Will asked Slate if he can accept his Friend reqest on Discord and explain to him the process of making his video as it seemed ideal for Ambassador Certification Program

  • Osmium's video for Ambassador Certification Program on Mindplex was previewed by every participant for feedback

  • On Osmium's video,WIll suggested: Needs to review other videos created by the members to get more idea of the overall video quality and making

  • On Osmium's Video : EseWilliams suggested text is slightly more and that she needs more time to read each slide before it gets changed, so suggested to increase the time duration of each slide

  • On Osmium's video, Malik suggested to lessen text . Peter : the heading "What" is missing

  • Then Ese Williams shared her infographic on Awakening - Health and asked for feedback

  • On Ese Williams infographic : Slate suggested to add "What" heading

  • On Ese Williams infographic The suggestions were: Peter The "What" reads more like a "why" Slate: Using the standard template design Slate: Robot pic is needed Peter: Include Meditation element of the robot Peter : "Where" has repetition

  • Will shared his infographic on SNET. Slate: It highlight the main 1 or 2 people who initially made the project come forward Slate: Need to put all the information into the Canva template that is being used for infographics

  • Devon : discuss the infographic with Headelf, async or maybe next meeting

Decision Items:

  • Osmium to rework his video

    • [effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup

  • Will and Ese to put their infographics into the Canva template

    • [effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup

Action Items:

  • [action] Rework and work on feedbacks given to each participants for their infographics and videos [assignee] everyone assigned [due] 13 February 2024 [status] in progress

  • [action] Post the meeting summary [assignee] Slate [due] 4 February 2024 [status] done

Keywords/tags:

  • topics covered: Meeting Summaries, ACP, Videomaking, infographic, quizzes

  • emotions: Collaborative, contructive criticism

Archival Workgroup

  • Type of meeting: Biweekly

  • Present: Stephen [facilitator], Stephen [documenter], André, Vanessa, Stephen, Slate, Onyeka

  • Meeting video: Link

  • Working Docs:

Action Items:

  • [action] Bring to next meeting a list of things that should be included in Governance GitBook update [assignee] Vanessa [due] 7 February 2024 [status] todo

  • [action] Manually finish archiving all summaries from Nov and Dec 2023, and close the issues for those months so that fund request can be submitted [assignee] Vanessa [due] 7 February 2024 [status] todo

  • [action] Once November and December 2023 are archived, submit funding requests for those months, and close Q4 2023 Budget issue [assignee] Stephen [due] 21 February 2024 [status] todo

  • [action] Draft an approach, with budget, for the Tag Taxonomy work, ready for next meeting on 7th Feb - done, and was agreed in this meeting, see https://github.com/SingularityNET-Archive/SingularityNET-Archive/issues/87 [assignee] Vanessa [due] 7 February 2024 [status] done

  • [action] Contact Ubio with brief for his work on LLM tooling - done, and agreed. Ubio will submit updates via the Issues called "Tool development: Ubio" [assignee] André [due] 31 January 2024 [status] done

  • [action] Core Archives team to meet with Supervisory Council re knowledge management on Fri 26th Jan - done, meeting was useful and discussions are ongoing on how we can best support knowledge management, especially around the Decentralisation Blueprint doc [assignee] Stephen, Vanessa, André [due] 26 January 2024 [status] done

  • [action] André to create a markdown template for correction of existing monthly GitBook records [assignee] André [due] 7 February 2024 [status] in progress

Keywords/tags:

  • topics covered: Tag taxonomy, bounties, monthly archiving, publicity, meeting summary tool, Tool Development, AI tooling, Governance GitBook, mentorship, transition from manual archiving to use of meeting summary tool, Outreach, Knowledge management across the singularityNET ecosystem

  • emotions: Organised, Discursive, Well-attended, outward-looking

Research and Development Guild

Agenda Items:

  • The overall purpose of the meeting was to go over the new R&D Guild list of proposed projects on the pipeline and to discuss the beter approach for development. Members present talked about their calendar and schedule availability to organize tasks and the coordinated effort of the task force

Discussion Points:

  • We discussed and agreed on final changes on budget to be presented on Feb 080224 Discussed, agreed and vote on operation structure and members contributors fees established to follow Ambassadors standards of $10 per Hour.

  • We discussed specific criteria for development strategy and tools to implement on the development.

  • We discussed and the members have reached an agreement on the operational budget allocation sving budget for development of tools and proposals.

  • Team members presented details of roadmaps for each proposal and members started showing their interest in participating on one or the other, this way we were able to build teams and start discussing tasks.

  • On Governance; members discussed how to move forward and present community proposals on next Q. Members have found an agreement on engaging other guilds on next Q to present their proposals and bring constructive feedback to pulish the blueprints and pulish the outcome.

  • AGIX Price $0.27 Q1 Total Estimated Cost in US Dollars $7,300 Q1 Total Estimated Cost in AGIX 27,037

Decision Items:

  • Budget needed for final adjustments to fit all projects proposed by guilds members needs, this will be conducted by leading members and presented for final approval on future teasury meeting.

    • [effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup

Action Items:

  • [action] Budget Fitting and adjustments for final approval at next treasuty call [assignee] Rojo, Guillermo [due] 12 January 2024 [status] done

Keywords/tags:

  • topics covered: Guilds , Budget , Tool Development, Proposal, Q1 projections, Quarter 1, AI tooling

  • emotions: Collaborative, productive

Thursday 8th February 2024

Treasury Guild

  • Type of meeting: Biweekly

  • Present: Tevo [facilitator], Tevo [documenter], Tevo, Vanessa, Peter, Rojo, William, Guilermo

  • Purpose: Structuring Ambassador rules around payments, tasks and anything related to financial activities

  • Meeting video: https://youtu.be/ZSofwygwiDU

  • Miro board: https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVN8kUlbw=/?moveToWidget=3458764574789806585&cot=10

  • Transcript: https://app.dework.xyz/singularitynet-ambas/treasury-guild-87240

  • Other media: https://youtu.be/HNvBpBYv68o

  • Working Docs:

Agenda item 1 - Output on Core contributors - [resolved]

Discussion Points:

  • When and how should we create the list of contributors?

Decision Items:

  • Creation of the First Core Contributor lists will be a manual operations

    • [effect] mayAffectOtherPeople

Action Items:

  • [action] Document a Clear list of rules to create the contributor list [status] todo

  • [action] Create a contributor list based on those rules [assignee] Tevo [status] todo

Agenda item 2 - Ambassador Q1 Budget Request to fit into Q1 Budget limit - [carry over]

Discussion Points:

  • Why are we going through proposal requests and trying to expect workgroups to adjust their budgets?

  • Who are objecting to fitted budget results?

  • Assessing workgroup budget requests

Decision Items:

  • enforce high-cost budget requests to reduce rewards by thousands

    • [effect] mayAffectOtherPeople

  • Translation WG Q1 Estimated budget request was changed from 2700$ to 1400$ and approved

    • [effect] mayAffectOtherPeople

  • Governance WG Q1 Estimated budget request was changed from 1350$ to 400$ and approved

    • [effect] mayAffectOtherPeople

  • New Ideas Budget % was increased from 0% to 2% to reflect the already rewarded Gamers Guild Q1 budget

    • [effect] mayAffectOtherPeople

  • Gamers Guild Q1 budget request was changed from 1900$ to 1050$ and approved

    • [effect] mayAffectOtherPeople

  • Strategy Guild Budget request was not approved

    • [effect] mayAffectOtherPeople

  • Education Guild Budget request was not approved

    • [effect] mayAffectOtherPeople

  • The R&D Guild Budget request was not approved

    • [effect] mayAffectOtherPeople

Action Items:

  • [action] Update the Budget Calculator Document with reasons or sources why the request is not approved [assignee] Tevo [status] done

  • [action] Explain Gamers Guild budget request changes to Gamer Guild leads [assignee] Tevo [status] done

Keywords/tags:

  • topics covered: Miro Board, Budget , Quarter 1, Proposals, Quarterly Budget Calculator, core contributors

  • other: As always expecting reducing rewards and stepping to people's toes brings up heated discussions, but I feel like we made quite some good progress on the meeting

Onboarding Workgroup

  • Type of meeting: Weekly

  • Present: All Members [facilitator], Peter [documenter], SucrenSpice, Peter, Vanessa, lord kizzy, LadyTempestt, duke peter

  • Working Docs:

In this meeting we discussed:

  • Our regular meeting was replaced by an open Onboarding session for new people, including a Q&A.

Decision Items:

  • The session was not videoed

    • [rationale] because the content was very similar to the previous Onboarding session here https://youtu.be/5gnF2Q2qLS0?si=V4AV3pIwdwQ-fgxW

    • [effect] mayAffectOtherPeople

Action Items:

  • [action] Notes were taken of the questions asked, and we will decide in our next meeting whether any of them need to be added to the Getting Started Discord channel as FAQ. [status] todo

To carry over for next meeting:

  • Deciding on whether to add any new FAQs to Getting Started channel

Keywords/tags:

  • topics covered: Onboarding, workgroups, the Ambassador role, Decision Making Process, Engagement, Getting Started

  • emotions: engaging new people, participatory, well organised

Deep Funding Town Hall

  • Type of meeting: Biweekly

  • Present: Jan Horlings, Judith [facilitator], Vanessa [documenter], Mercy, Joshua, Mohammed, Rafael Cardoso, Rojo, Kenn, Guillermo, Kenric Nelson, Seira, Ammar, Musonda Bemba, Mauro Andreoli

  • Purpose: Offering a space for proposers in Deep Funding round 3 to present their proposals

Timestamped video:

This week's Town Hall was replaced by a Deep Funding Spotlight Day, with presentations from proposers in Deep Funding round 3.

0:00 Intro 0:31 Df Spotlight Day Presentation By Judith 4:06 Deep Funding Test Round Updates By Jan 7:30 Breakout Room # 1 1:20:53 Breakout Room # 2

Keywords/tags:

  • topics covered: DeepFunding, Deep funding round 3

Friday 9th February 2024

Video Workgroup

  • Type of meeting: Weekly

  • Present: hogantuso [facilitator], devon [documenter], cardano_class, lord kizzy, malik, Zalfred, killy, Rojo

  • Purpose: The main purpose of the meeting was to discuss the Video Suggestion Sheet, focusing on whether we need to form partnerships for creating video content.

Discussion Points:

  • Malik, as a social media manager, regularly updated about video upload statuses.

  • Rojo and Judith's recommendations for videos were brought up during the meeting.

  • Lord Kizzy, as the task manager, gave weekly task updates.

  • Kizzy discussed the deadline for Lily's and Cardano class's townhall video submissions.

  • A discussion took place regarding the video suggestion sheet.

  • Tuso discussed the process of pairing members for suggested video.

  • Rojo discussed that whether members should pair up before making a suggestion, or they should pair up after a video has been suggested.

  • Rojo mentioned that there is a budget for only 4 long videos.

  • OEP stated that pairing should ensure that everyone has the opportunity to participate in the video production process.

Decision Items:

  • Malik will conduct an analysis of the views and likes, subsequently providing an update to the workgroup regarding these metrics.

  • [effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup

  • Pairing of members for the suggested video.

    • [effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup

Action Items:

  • [action] Performing an analysis of video metrics across various social media platforms. [assignee] malik [status] in progress

Keywords/tags:

  • topics covered: social media management, workgroup updates, video suggestion sheet

  • emotions: Friendly, Collaborative, Thoughtful , speedy

Writers Workgroup

Narrative:

Kenichi suggested the tool Wudpecker (https://www.wudpecker.io/) to record our meetings for more accuracy.

Dework updates: Slate gave an update on the Cogito article "Enhancing Security: The Role of Machine Learning in Risk Mitigation".

Cj Frankie gave an update on his task on Dework; he’ll have a submission by Saturday (10th Feb) evening.

There were corrections to be made to a few articles written by members of the workgroup.

LadyTempestt raised questions about the points system task on Dework. Kenichi explained that the points system is used to track the efforts and contribution to the workgroup, not the time contributed to completing tasks.

Kenichi made awareness regarding the Substack newsletter as a recurring task. The substack newsletter is an article/blogpost containing all the guilds' and workgroups' meetings summary for the week. There was discussion on ways to assign Scribblers to the Substack newsletter task.

Onboarding new members: Precious was given introduction into the workgroup, and the test was also shared. Good luck, Precious!

Decision Items:

  • the note-taker ai from Wudpecker (https://www.wudpecker.io/) will be integrated into our next meeting

    • [rationale] To inprove accuracy

    • [effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup

  • For the Substack task, the Scribbler assigned for the week will assign a different Scribbler for the following week.

    • [effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup

Action Items:

  • [action] Kenichi will send the WG's budget proposal to Treasury today: this funding will be used to incentivize our points system and the weekly trivia session - Done. See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jvQ4DfJd6WYsYdZORg8t4g3Dsft88guYno7bxWIMsVQ/edit?usp=sharing [assignee] Kenichi [due] 2 February 2024 [status] done

  • [action] Cj Frankie will make a submission for his task on Dework before Monday 12th Feb [assignee] cjfrankie [due] 12 February 2024 [status] todo

  • [action] Lady Tempestt and Slate will make proper corrections to their articles. [assignee] LadyTempestt, Slate [due] 16 February 2024 [status] todo

Keywords/tags:

  • topics covered: Substack, new people, new members, corrections, points system, Dework, Onboarding, cohort edit session, Wudpecker, AI summaries, useful documentation, Meeting Summaries, Cogito, security, machine learning, risk mitigation, tracking, contribution

  • emotions: calm, interactive

Saturday 10th February 2024

PreviousWeek 5NextWeek 7

Last updated

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License