Week 16
Wednesday 17th April 2024
Archives Workgroup
Type of meeting: Biweekly
Present: Stephen [facilitator], Stephen, Vanessa [documenter], Vanessa, Stephen, André, lord kizzy, SucrenSpice, Photogee, Tevo, SoundWaves, duke peter, esewilliams
Meeting video: Link
Working Docs:
Decision Items:
We agreed our Q2 budget, see https://github.com/SingularityNET-Archive/SingularityNET-Archive/issues/131 and https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1d9j-IPA0wary0EdR8YIoKl1BF0mAtkV_dgTs0hSnzAs/edit?usp=sharing
[rationale] After discussion and decisionmaking on ideas for budget items from WG members, removing some items that we did in Q1 and no longer need, and adjusting prices for some of the "bounty-style" tasks that are continued from Q1 to reflect the amount of work they involve, we agreed a final budget request for Q2 of $7,670
We note that the Supervisory Council will be discussing, and hopefully deciding on, our input on supporting their knowledge management processes with the Blueprint doc on 19th April 2024, which has been in discussion since January 2024.
[rationale] They now have clarity on what budget they have (tho it will obviously be dependent on token price); and the SC's term of office ends in May so a decision is needed
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
On timestamping BGI videos: we noted Duke has needed to drop out due to pressure of other work. Also - it's now 8 videos, not 9. Timestamps will be added as comments, rather than in the description
[rationale] Only 8 videos because the 9th has already been timestamped. Timestamps as a comment, rather than in the description: no need to organise access to DF Youtube; also, makes it transparent who did them.
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Action Items:
[action] Stephen to check why SucrenSpice doesn't seem to have permissions to merge changes on Ambassador GitBook - still can't work out why [assignee] Stephen [due] 1 May 2024 [status] in progress
[action] Onyeka and Ese to timestamp BGI videos [assignee] esewilliams, lord kizzy [due] 1 May 2024 [status] in progress
[action] Duke to create a video walkthru of how to use the GitHub Board, based on Stephen's training session - see https://github.com/SingularityNET-Archive/SingularityNET-Archive/issues/116 [assignee] duke peter [due] 1 May 2024 [status] in progress
[action] Everyone to suggest possible new bounties or entry-level tasks for Q2 budget, to discuss next meeting - some people would still like time to contribute so this will be finalised next meeting (17th April) [assignee] all [due] 17 April 2024 [status] done
[action] Vani to send Q1 quarterly report to Peter (and, if time, create 2nd version based on the budget request spreadsheet) [assignee] Vanessa [due] 17 April 2024 [status] done
[action] Sucre to add the Q1 quarterly report to Ambassador GitBook when ready [assignee] SucrenSpice [due] 1 May 2024 [status] in progress
[action] Vanessa to DM participants in tag taxonomy project, and set a date for training session [assignee] Vanessa [due] 1 May 2024 [status] in progress
[action] Progress the idea of doing a TH session on how we use GitHub [assignee] Stephen, André, Vanessa [due] 1 May 2024 [status] todo
[action] Vanessa to find out whether Strategy Guild is now folded into R&D guild, or whether theyre still separate and will be submitting separate meeting summaries [assignee] Vanessa [due] 25 April 2024 [status] todo
[action] Core Archives team to meet with Ubio on Mon 22nd April to clarify the focus of his work in Q2 - sentiment analyisis or dashboard? [assignee] Stephen, Andre, Vanessa, Ubio [due] 22 April 2024 [status] todo
[action] Ese to talk to Kenichi to find out whether Writers WG are currently doing meeting summaries; and if so, whether they plan to add them via the Tool; or if not, could they add them at least to their spreadsheet here https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1S1M-IlMnI4WPL2c_ojOeIExvWU-bkzfamirE5_Ls9-4/edit?usp=sharing [assignee] esewilliams [due] 1 May 2024 [status] todo
Keywords/tags:
topics covered: Q1 quarterly report, Q2 budget, community engagement, engaging new people, Quarterly Report, Tag taxonomy, forward planning, Reporting, Miro Board, colabs, langchain, AI tooling, open source, document management, closing issues, github board, monthly archiving
emotions: positive, new people present, entertaining, Friendly, Ambitious, forward-looking, participatory
Research and Development Guild
Type of meeting: Weekly
Present: Curtis, Guilermo [facilitator], Onyeka [documenter], Photogee, Ubiodee, 5oundwave5, Vasu, Peter, WaKa
Purpose: R&D Discussions
Working Docs:
Agenda Items:
Final Q1 Report and deliverables status
Budget Request presentation for R&D Guild Quarter 2.
Allocation for supporting upcoming open source initiatives from SingularityNET foundation
Helping on the MeTTa documentation and playground page Q2 R&D Guild Objectives
Operations: Update. Improving R&D Manager Tools. Introducing R&D Github Projects.
Governance SandBox: Decision-making tools.
Onboarding: New proposal for development
Conclusions Q1: what we can improve?
Discussion Points:
Discussions on Q2 Budget Proposal
Discussions on GitHub integration for Project management
Discussions on allocation for supporting upcoming open source initiatives from SingularityNET foundation
Final discussions on Q1 report and deliverables
Updates on development by Curtis, Ubio, WaKa.
Discussions on helping on the MeTTa documentation and playground page Q2 R&D Guild Objectives
Decision Items:
We decided to change the time slot for our meetings from 18:00 to 16:00 UTC
[rationale] Guillermo and some other members complained on the meeting time being inconvenient for them.
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Action Items:
[action] Rojo to continue building the back end and conduct backend testing with members of the project who manage the social media account; once that is done, then build the front end [assignee] Rojo [due] 3 April 2024 [status] in progress
[action] Guillermo to assist the other teams to get some deliverables [assignee] Guillermo [due] 3 April 2024 [status] in progress
[action] Curtis and Rojo to create a document for showcasing our progress (deliverables) in the guild [assignee] Curtis, Rojo [due] 3 April 2024 [status] in progress
[action] Guillermo to have a call with Ubio on providing assistance to the multilingual project [assignee] Guilermo [due] 11 April 2024 [status] todo
[action] Guild members to add their contributions to the docs [assignee] All Members [due] 17 April 2024 [status] in progress
[action] Ubio, WaKa, Rojo to add their contributions to the R&D _ Q1 Proposal Report _ Template. [assignee] Ubiodee, WaKa, Rojo [due] 17 April 2024 [status] todo
[action] Lord kizzy to message Rojo on how he could contribute to the Automated Social Media project. [assignee] lord kizzy [due] 17 April 2024 [status] todo
[action] Lordkizzy to share his Doc on ways he could contribute to the R&D Guild [due] 24 April 2024 [status] todo
Keywords/tags:
topics covered: Guilds , Budget , Tool Development, Proposal, AI tooling, API, deliverables, incentives, Q2 budget, open source, contributing, Automated, social media, automated social media, Quarterly Report, Q1 quarterly report, multilingual, meeting time
emotions: Collaborative, productive, Thoughtful , speedy
Education Workgroup
Type of meeting: Weekly
Present: Slate [facilitator], Slate [documenter], Slate, Clement Umoh, Photogee, GorgaSeagian, Peter, malik, osmium, WaKa, SoundWaves, Billy
Purpose: ACP Quizzes Review Team update , Andamio platform introduction by Malik, Google Classroom introduction by Slate, Pricing discussion about both the platforms
Working Docs:
In this meeting we discussed:
ACP Review Team updates
Andamio platform
Google Classroom platform
Pricing discussions
Discussion Points:
Meeting started with Slate welcoming everyone to the meeting
Osmium shared some concerns of Duke regarding his quiz review
Osmium than gave some updates regarding quizzes review
Slate than moved on the topic of introduction of ACP platforms
Then Malik showcased his presentation regarding the Andamio platform
Everyone was concerned with the pricing of Andamio platform
and also the complexity of understanding the platform as a whole by the participants
Then there was a proposal to invite Tevo to once of the education guild meetings to introduce Andamio
Then Waka mentioned that we should be adding Fetch and Ocean to the ACP as projects
On this Peter said that it would be best if we let them create these resources for us and for that we could reach out to them
Waka said that he would be interested in doing that
Then Slate shared the Google Classroom platform presentation
Everybody liked the platform as a whole and its easiness to interact with
There were positive insights for the platform by the group
Decision Items:
Reach out to Fetch and Ocean
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Create a real time presentaion for Google Classroom
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Action Items:
[action] Presentation with real quiz submissions, reviewing and marking for test run [assignee] Slate [due] 23 April 2024 [status] in progress
[action] Reach out to fetch and ocean [assignee] WaKa [due] 23 April 2024 [status] in progress
Keywords/tags:
topics covered: ACP, review, platform, quizzes, Fetch, Ocean
emotions: productive, Collaborative, Businesslike, speedy
Knowledge Base Workgroup
Type of meeting: Biweekly
Present: Tevo [facilitator], Tevo [documenter], Tevo, Olokoji, lord kizzy, André, Photogee
Purpose: Aggregating Ambassador Program assets and relevant information under GitBook
Miro board: Link
Transcript: Link
Other media: Link
Working Docs:
Agenda item 1 - Onboarding - [carry over]
Discussion Points:
We have new feedback on the workgroup onboarding form.
Decision Items:
We will postpone the onboarding improvements discussions until we can async do the Organizing steps.
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Action Items:
[action] Discuss Onboarding improvements and insights on form improvements. [status] todo
Agenda item 2 - Organized Onboarding Workgroup GitBook assets - [carry over]
Discussion Points:
Our approach to organizing (5min video): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJ8FYsFb0TQ
Decision Items:
We found seven times more places where Feedback Form Item could fit in the organizing window.
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Action Items:
[action] The rest of the three Onboarding workgroup items we put up for the async test round [status] todo
Agenda item 3 - What would be our async organizing outcome expectations and rewards? - [carry over]
Discussion Points:
How much budget we have left? ~2k AGIX Left
How much experience do we expect from participants?
Organizer and Organizer Reviewer Roles
Role activities and process
Role Rewards
Decision Items:
Two people should organize each Async item. (we can afford the quality and diversity of thought)
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
To obtain an Organizer and Organizer Reviewer Role, you must attend one session where we Organize Items live.
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
We use purple sticky if we want to remove items from organized places.
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
We use Miro Board Kanban to manage Organizing Items Async.
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Organizing Item Rewards is based on the default hourly rate and the average time it takes to complete an Item.
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
The first five Organized Items give 50% less rewards for a contributor.
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Organizing and Reviewing have the same rate
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Action Items:
[action] Test Organizing one Item by the end of 24th April [status] todo
[action] Test Reviewing one Organized Item before the next session. [status] todo
Keywords/tags:
topics covered: organizing, review, Budget , Onboarding, Ambassador GitBook, Miro Board
Thursday 18th April 2024
Treasury Guild
Type of meeting: Biweekly
Present: Tevo [facilitator], Tevo [documenter], Tevo, Peter, Vanessa, Olokoji, Photogee, Billy, Guillermo, Gorga Siagian, 5oundwave5
Purpose: Structuring Ambassador rules around payments, tasks and anything related to financial activities
Miro board: Link
Other media: Link
Agenda item 1 - How to contribute with writing skills? - [resolved]
Discussion Points:
Writers WG
Treasury Guild Documentations (decisions, meeting summary)
Agenda item 2 - Do we want to recognize people who take part in the consent process on-chain? - [resolved]
Discussion Points:
incentives
What we recognize?
Decision Items:
We will recognize the Consent Question (Title) and participants who chose any option in the form
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
We assign utility tokens as rewards
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
Action Items:
[action] Continue utility token discussion in Governance Workgroup [status] todo
Agenda item 3 - How do validate the impact of said proposal - [carry over]
Discussion Points:
What has been done before?
What do we need from the Proposal?
Ambassador Program Consent Process
S3 guide for potential objection solving https://patterns.sociocracy30.org/principle-consent.html
What blockers can people bring up against budget requests?
After funding measures
Proposal Request Cap
Decision Items:
Ambassador Program Q2 Budget proposal final deadline is 24th April 2024
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
We will collect proposals through the Treasury Guild channel.
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
Only Contributor Role blockers will stop the proposal from passing
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
Action Items:
[action] Prepare voting tools and channel for all this decision making that is about to come [status] todo
[action] Decision for next session: do we have the capacity to run 2nd cohort of proposals for Q2? [status] todo
Keywords/tags:
topics covered: Miro Board, procedures, Proposal, Cohort, On-Chain, Quarter, Governance, Budgets, Rewards, core contributors, consent decision making, Q2 budget
emotions: Discursive, inconclusive
Friday 19th April 2024
Video Workgroup
Type of meeting: Weekly
Present: Slate [facilitator], devon [documenter], malik, hogantuso, Zalfred, Photogee, osmium, killy, GorgaSeagian, 5oundwave5, oep, Billy
Purpose: The meeting focused on task updates, Zealy updates, and community engagement
Working Docs:
Discussion Points:
Weekly meeting agenda outlined by Slate
Malik, the social media manager, provided a rundown of the weekly updates and also shared information about Zealy.
Hogantuso, the task manager, provided updates on the weekly management tasks.
Discussion on the process of Zealy
Improving community engagement
A representative from Gamers' Guild explained their Roblox game and asked some questions about the video workgroup for inclusion in the game.
Keywords/tags:
topics covered: social media management, workgroup updates, new people, Zealy, videomaking, Roblox, Gamers' Guild, community engagement
emotions: Friendly, Casual, positive, Thoughtful
Writers Workgroup
Type of meeting: Weekly
Present: Kenichi [facilitator], Cjfrankie [documenter], Kenichi, Cjfrankie, Mikasa, LadyTempestt, ines ganina, Slate, devon
Working Docs:
Narrative:
The NuNet community town hall has commenced. Ines Gavina shared some interesting ideas that might help us produce more articles in the future. Kenichi gave an update regarding the Cogito articles from last year; the third piece is on its way! Kenichi explained how Dework tasks are being reviewed. Kenichi shared more insights into the “Scribe" role: anyone with this role can seamlessly claim tasks on Dework. Deliberations on whether the Scribes should attend the weekly meetings; how long Scribbers should hold the Scribe role and what minimum threshold they should have.
Decision Items:
Kenichi wants the Scribblers to do a recap on every NuNet TH.
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
Action Items:
[action] Kenichi to chase Kareem regarding updates on the brand assets [assignee] Kenichi [status] done
[action] Kenichi to write the first NuNet community town hall recap before assigning it to any Scribe. [assignee] Kenichi [status] done
Keywords/tags:
topics covered: Scribe role, Rejuve, Q2 recap, Nunet, Cogito, Points system, NuNet Town Hall, Dework, Cogito articles
emotions: quiet, informative
Saturday 20th April 2024
Gamers Guild
Type of meeting: Biweekly
Present: Slate [facilitator], devon [documenter], malik, rebel, hufiumer69, lord kizzy, Gorga Siagian, 5oundwave5, flyn, Billy, Dr Strange, AndrewBen
Purpose: Task Assignment and Procedures for Task Execution
Working Docs:
Discussion Points:
Slate outlined the meeting agenda
discussion on monitor role in information collection
Discussion on the presenter's role in information collection.
discussion on other platforms for game creation
Discussion about the layout of the model
Discussion on game development on Roblox
Action Items:
[action] Gorga to create next game for the gaming session. [assignee] Gorga Siagian [due] 27 April 2024 [status] todo
[action] research regarding decentraland [assignee] devon [status] todo
Game Rules:
Combat Shooting Game The person with least amount of deaths wins
Leaderboard:
1st Dr Strange
Keywords/tags:
topics covered: Rewards, Budget , Roblox, participation, Task Assignment
emotions: Friendly, Collaborative, engaging new people
games played: Combat Shooting Game
Last updated