Week 4
Mon 20th Jan - Sun 26th Jan 2025
Tuesday 21st January 2025
GitHub PBL WG
Type of meeting: Monthly
Present: Tevo [facilitator], Gorga Siagian, Tevo [documenter], Tevo, Gorga Siagian, Malik, AshleyDawn, Effiom, LadyTempestt, Onize, Sebastian Pabon, SubZero, Sucre n Spice
Purpose: We are creating a PBL course on Andamio about GitHub features and use cases to manage
Miro board: Link
Other media: Link
Agenda item 1 - Workgroup management - [carry over]
Discussion Points:
Dework Board For Task Management
Guiding Material For Meeting Summaries 10min Video on How we manage meeting summaries in general?
Draft Quarter 1 Report
Decision Items:
missing a lot of time recognition from Dework Lessons so no Lessons have been rewarded yet
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Gorga creates meeting summaries and Tevo reviews them after using voting.
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Draft Quarter 1 Report Can use previous reports and proposals as reference material
Action Items:
[action] Gorga to create meeting summary [assignee] Gorga Siagian [due] 27 January 2025 [status] done
[action] Tevo to review meeting summary [assignee] Tevo [due] 27 January 2025 [status] done
[action] Malik to create Draft Quarter 1 Report [assignee] Malik [due] 21 January 2025 [status] todo
[action] Gorga to review Draft Quarter 1 Report [assignee] Gorga Siagian [due] 21 January 2025 [status] todo
Agenda item 2 - Finalise and Upload Lessons to Andamio - [carry over]
Discussion Points:
We reviewed Introduction and Course Requirement module
What issues we ran into as Andamio Course creators?
What changes we should do for lessons?
Improvements suggested on Feedback Form
Filling form took about 7 to 25mins even for a simple one, might need to consider it for reward formula
Decision Items:
Currently Students should expect to take lesson in Desktop Computer. Andamio is not yet mobile friendly
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
filling form took about 7 to 25mins even for a simple one, I might need to consider it for reward formula
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Everyone to use the Opening Question as for the title of each lesson (currently its Learning target or document title). Opening Questions can be found on Miro Board at Structure View
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Action Items:
[action] Andamio to update site to allow shareing assignments. Currently Course creators can not create “courseNftPolicyId” [assignee] Andamio Team [due] 21 January 2025 [status] in progress
[action] We found Andamio Issues while testing our GitHub PBL Course: more details with pictures can be found on GitHub PBL miro board
Error Msg “MODULE_NAME is not live!” is displayed, but we see it publickly visible page.
Navigation doesn't always work left side (Doesnt work for Module 101, URL changed by clicking navigation, but content did not, and sometimes work for other navigations and sometimes not. )
Trying to add course member gives error
The intial pop up texts don't resize with browser screen, requires people to resize their computer screen in order to scroll down and click pop up away
Some UI elements are as white squares and miss information
After saving file with new edit, it deleted all the edits and loaded the previous version (We were able to get a previous text back by pressing Ctrl+Z).
[assignee] Andamio Team [due] 21 January 2025 [status] in progress
[action] Onize to update the lesson 101.1 with include alue addition from the Proposal + Goals and include the link Recent Proposals and include the Miro Board link. [assignee] Onize [due] 21 January 2025 [status] todo
[action] Onize to Remove or adjust lesson 101 introduction final 2 messages to be more related to current usecases in Ambassador Program [assignee] Onize [due] 21 January 2025 [status] todo
Agenda item 3 - What data we loose if Dework Goes down for good? - [carry over]
Discussion Points:
Templates and practiced experience to recognise value. Proof of linked assets and operations related to the contribution
What data we retain? We currently find the title of activity and its assiociated labels more relevant than the detailed data itself in Dework. The dework task is audited at the point of value validation and afterwards the transaction data is becomes important as it indicates value
How we continue?
Decision Items:
We continue to strive for integrating Github Project Board with Treasury Management System
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Keywords/tags:
topics covered: Workgroup Management, Quarter 1 Report, Rewards, PBL Course Project, Andamio PBL Courses Issue, PBL Courses on Andamio
emotions: Collaborative, insightful
Wednesday 22nd January 2025
Education Workgroup
Type of meeting: Weekly
Present: Slate [facilitator], Slate [documenter], FranklynStein, AshleyDawn, Clement Umoh, esewilliams, frosh, Gorga Siagian, kenichi, LordKizzy, Malik, Mikasa, osmium, Zalfred, maxmilez, Slate
Purpose: Wiki Website Update by Franklyn- AI For Beginners Update by Ese- CCCP process- Webinar Series- Governance workshop - Presentation Series-Certification Program Retro Session/Feedback
In this meeting we discussed:
Wiki Website Update by Franklyn
AI For Beginners Update by Ese
Webinar Series
CCCP process
Governance workshop
Presentation Series
Certification Program Retro Session/Feedback(Shift to async)
Discussion Points:
Slate started the meeting greeting everyone
The meeting started with a presentation from Franklyn in regards to the Wiki website creation in which various pointers were given by Slate in order to improve the website
Changes will be implemented by Franklyn in regards to the website by next week
An update was given by ese for the ai for beginners project that she is back from the break and will be taking a look at the approved videos and also for the new video if any would be available to be posted for vote
Then she also mentioned that she is checking out the previous work of people in regards to SEO and graphics for her to select the best candidate for the task
Then the initial document was presented by clement and ese in regards to the project Webinar Series, the document looked solid , osmium notified that ai sandbox and thinktank is also doing something similar
Slate said that we could collaborate with sandbox and thinktank in regards to this to implement this ,ese and clement will reach out to sandbox in regards to this to get more clarity
Then a miro was presented by osmium showcasing the process of certification program on which Slate commented that its the same process as was used before and that he would personally be refining its process
Osmium also shared the initial document for the project Governance workshop and that now he would be moving forward with its blueprint
AFter wards Slate said that we have to hold a retrospective session for CCCP to get feedback from Participants, and also how we can improve - Announcement task taken by Gorga - Miro Creation taken by Osmium
Kenichi gave an update on the presentation series that he is working with the module 1 person in regards to this and that he will go module by module for each step
Certification Program Retro Session/Feedback will be shift to asyn form due to low participation today
Decision Items:
Certification Program Retro Session/Feedback will be shift to asyn form due to low participation today
[rationale] mostAgreed
[opposing] nil
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
ese and clement will reach out to sandbox in regards to this to get more clarity
[rationale] most agreed
[opposing] nil
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Action Items:
[action] Frank to make adjustment in the website design [assignee] FranklynStein [due] 29 January 2025 [status] in progress
[action] Slate to udpate osmium process miro [assignee] Slate [due] 29 January 2025 [status] in progress
[action] Create retrospective form [assignee] Slate [due] 29 January 2025 [status] in progress
Keywords/tags:
topics covered: CCCP, announcement, design, Task Assignment, AI for beginners, Wiki website
emotions: productive, Collaborative, Businesslike.
LatAm Guild
Type of meeting: Weekly
Present: guillermolucero [facilitator], SergioBenaR [documenter], guillermolucero, andrea reyes, SergioBenaR
Purpose: Retrospective 2024, roadmap Q1 and task assignment.
Meeting video: [Link](No available)
Transcript: [Link](No available)
Working Docs:
Agenda item 1 - Onboarding subgroup - [carry over]
Narrative:
As part of LatAm_SNET's objectives, we constantly seek to have active members committed to the mission of SingularityNET and its ecosystem. Andrea Reyes joins the team of ambassadors, highlighting her participation and contributions in Deep Funding circles.
Decision Items:
Andrea Reyes joins the Latam_SNET working groups to have the participation of people who are part of the SingulatiryNET ecosystem in Mexico.
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Action Items:
[action] Andrea Reyes will be added to the official organization and communications system of the Latam_SNET working groups. [assignee] guillermolucero [due] 30 enero 2025 [status] done
Agenda item 2 - Strategy Subgroup - [carry over]
Narrative:
One of the objectives of LatAm_SNET is to have the participation and representation of different Latin American countries. Currently, the team of ambassadors has members from Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil and Mexico, with Colombia being the country in which we do not yet have an ambassador. It is important to continue the search for this member from Colombia, who, if possible, could have a technical profile.
Decision Items:
Latam_SNET ambassadors and working group members will be looking for people from Colombia who can join the Latam_SNET team, also events all over Latin America in which SingularityNET might be interested in participating as a sponsor, ally, speaker facilitator or as a guest.
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Action Items:
[action] Search for people from Colombia interested in artificial intelligence and blockchain technology in Latin American communities who can complement the team, for example, in technical aspects. [assignee] andrea reyes, guillermolucero, Martin Rivero, SergioBenaR [due] 30 enero 2025 [status] in progress
[action] Search for events in Latin America and by country in which SingularityNET might be interested in participating. [assignee] guillermolucero, andrea reyes, Martin Rivero, SergioBenaR [due] 30 enero 2025 [status] todo
Keywords/tags:
topics covered: retrospective, task assignment, New members, Mexico, Colombia
Research and Development Guild
Type of meeting: Weekly
Present: guillermolucero [facilitator], lord kizzy [documenter], lord kizzy, AshleyDawn, advanceameyaw, guillermolucero, osmium, CollyPride, kenichi, Slate, BoazB, Eric Davies
Purpose: R&D Updates and Discussions
Working Docs:
Agenda Items:
Welcoming new Members and Introduction
Review of last meeting summary Action Items
UPDATE STATUS ON DEVELOPMENT: EC-Entity-Connections, W3CD-Web3-Contributors-Dashboard, CSDB-Collaboration-Skills-Database, Social-Media-Dashboard, Reputation-System-using-SoulBound-Tokens-SBTs
Open discussions
MetaCoders Lab Discussion
Discussion Points:
Review of last meeting summary Action Items: Advance went through the action items for the previous meeting and we had a brief introduction for new members
Retrospective and goals for 2025: we had a retrospective session where members contributed on their views
R&D Guild Metta Code Lab Initiative: We presented a proposal for the RFPs and we are awaiting a confirmation, we also need to create a taskforce for the Metta Coder lab
Follow up on the CSDB: Advance noted that the team is addressing challenges with integrating and hosting two projects. Initially planned to be unified, they are now being deployed and hosted separately due to complications. Efforts are focused on cleanup and exploring the use of Supabase for the admin portal to securely house data and reduce hosting costs. The team is evaluating the best approach and will provide updates in future meetings or reports.
UPDATE STATUS ON DEVELOPMENT: Governance Dashboard, Lordkizzy and guillermo are yet to have the call, guillermo gave an update from the previous session and noted to share a document next week. he also spoke on getting advance and Aj joining the project once they are done with the CSDB project.
R&D Guild: We are going to onboard new proposals this quarter
UPDATE STATUS ON DEVELOPMENT: Legacy 2.0: Kenichi noted that he still doesn't have access to the rojo database, and he hopes on using this to test a weighting metric called weighted liquid rank
Decision Items:
We decided that we are going to onboard new proposals this quarter
[rationale] we need to ensure the current team present deliverables and take up new proposals
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Action Items:
[action] Lordkizzy and guillermo to have a call to discuss on the governance dashboard project [assignee] LordKizzy, guillermolucero [due] 29 January 2025 [status] todo
[action] ALL team members to provide a Quarterly report on projects in developments [assignee] Team members [due] 29 January 2025 [status] todo
[action] Guillermo to create a task force sheet for members to express interest in contributing to the Metta Coder Lab [assignee] guillermolucero [due] 29 January 2025 [status] todo
[action] Lordkizzy to schedule a call with guillermo to structure the next proposal voting round [assignee] guillermolucero [due] 29 January 2025 [status] todo
[action] Lordkizzy to set up a call with all the team members on their projects [assignee] LordKizzy [due] 29 January 2025 [status] todo
Keywords/tags:
topics covered: Tool Development, AI tooling, Presentation, Operations , Workshop, Facilitation, CSDB
emotions: Casual, speedy , Welcoming, Thoughtful , Friendly, Collaborative
Thursday 23rd January 2025
Governance Workgroup
Type of meeting: Weekly
Present: Duke [facilitator], martinsoki, CallyFromAuron [documenter], PeterE, CallyFromAuron, Sucre n Spice, osmium, Duke, hogantuso, AshleyDawn, Effiom, Clement Umoh, LordKizzy, AJ, Kateri, Slate, martinsoki
Purpose: Weekly Governance WG meeting
Working Docs:
Narrative:
Criteria for core contributors:
In the last round, there was room for self-nomination and nomination by others, for people that didn't reach the criteria for getting the core contributor role.
The meeting noted Tevo's comments in the GovWG Discord channel about the rewards threshold and participation threshold: "Some of the downsides come because the rewards are more centralised to current core contributors and seems high earners are earning even more funds compared to last quarter, leaving out less tasks for people to reach 1000 AGIX threshold. In addition the core contributor list by rewards also affected by the price changes. The higher the AGIX price goes, the harder is to reach the threshold. However, the majority of renominated members are due to not attending enough meetings or not being recognized. From next quarter if people interested we can double down on Process Guild service to import Zoom participation to Treasury Manager, for now I do not know if we have funds for that. we definitely have the capability (even if still semi-automated)".
and from Vani: "But interestingly, this means we have 60 core contributors this time - and (what I am pretty sure is) a record 20% having been manually nominated. Hmmm... does this suggest we need to have a look at the criteria? Or are the criteria fine, and these are just anomalies?"
Currently we use:
Time-based recognition What does "participation" mean? Is it just for passively attending meetings, or for actually taking part? speaking, commenting in Chat, etc) Vani noted that for now it is based only on attendance - we can't easily capture who is contributing in a meeting, as it could be complex to capture who spoke or commented in Chat.
Fund request recognition Clement noted that the criterion for having to be rewarded with at least 1000 AGIX in the last three months is not fair because of fluctuation in token price.
Peter noted that we don't require both time-based recognition and fund request recognition: it's either / or. However, the meeting still felt that the threshold should be in USD, not AGIX, to minimise the effects of token price fluctuation. After discussion, we agreed the threshold should be 300 USD a quarter.
Self nomination:
Should self-nomination continue to be possible, for people who have not reached the criteria for being a core contributor? Vani raised the issue of potential hostile capture if people can self-nominate, and suggested there should be no self-nomination; nominations should have to be made by an existing Core Contributor. Peter said he thinks it would usually be OK if a person is new and nominates themself. A poll was drawn and 11 people out of 14 said there should be no self nomination, but we agreed that we will revisit the decision after the end of Q1 2025.
Proposal for Attendance at the ETHiopia conference https://eth-iopia.xyz/ By Clement and Advanceameyaw They would like to be funded from Program reserves to represent sNET at this event. We noted that 2 focus groups have met to discuss criteria for using Reserves for event attendance - their recommendations have not yet been discussed or ratified, but this proposal meets most of them except a suggested budget limit per person. However, we also noted that this suggested limit may be too low - flights within Africa are very expensive, so a low budget limit could have the unintended effect of preventing African’s from attending African events The proposal was explained and we concluded that the proposal should be posted in Discord for all core contributors to consent or object, and the results should be discussed in the Open Governance meeting on Thurs 28th Jan.
Discussion Points:
Criteria to be core contributor
Self nomination
attendance at ETHiopia conference
Decision Items:
We agreed to change the fund request recognition criterion for becoming a Core Contributor from 1000 AGIX to 300 USD
[rationale] Because, given that many WGs set task prices in USD, having the threshold in AGIX makes it unfairly difficult to become a core contributor when token price is low.
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
We decided that for the coming Quarter (Q2 2025) self-nomination will no longer be possible
[opposing] we agreed that we will revisit this decision after the end of Q1 2025
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
Action Items:
[action] Vani to make a consent form for the proposal to attend the ETHiopia event in February, and post it in the "Decision To Be Made" Discord channel [assignee] CallyFromAuron [due] 28 January 2025 [status] todo
Keywords/tags:
topics covered: core contributors, participation, self-nomination, events attendance, Program reserves
emotions: long, slow, straightforward
African Guild
Type of meeting: Weekly
Present: Duke [facilitator], martinsoki [documenter], Clement, Advanceameyaw, Cjfrankie, Martin Soki, SucrenSpice, esewilliams, Kateri, Ayo, Onize, Duke, Kossiso Royce, BoazB, Celiwe_South Africa
Purpose: The African Guild weekly meeting.
Narrative:
Introduction: The meeting began with a discussion led by Duke about the quorum required for the weekly meetings. He raised the question of what should be the minimum number of attendees needed to constitute a valid meeting, given that their average attendance is around 14-15 people, but they've had meetings with as few as 3-4 people. We debated whether decisions made by a smaller quorum should be considered binding, even if the majority of members were absent.
Ese suggested that the quorum could be set at a minimum of 6 members, with the understanding that the gravity of the agenda items should also be considered. Ayo felt that monthly meetings would not work if the goal is to build a true community, and that bi-weekly meetings are more appropriate. We agreed to keep the meeting time the same, despite some suggestions to change it.
The discussion then moved to marketing initiatives. Ese reported they are still in the ideation phase, and need to have final brainstorming sessions to select a campaign focused on engaging the wider African community. Duke suggested it would be helpful to plan marketing initiatives further in advance, aligning them with the overall Singularity Net narrative and topics like Artificial Superintelligence (ASI).
Kossiso provided an update on Colossal AI's efforts to democratize access to AI in Africa. They are planning a series of training programs in February to teach people how to integrate AI into their workflows, as well as how to deploy large language models locally. This will be followed by a policy discussion event in March, and the launch of their own AI model, Imara, built on the DeepSeek foundation.
Clement discussed an upcoming "Afro-AI Multilingual Literacy Drive" initiative, which will focus on creating community-centered educational materials to demystify AI and showcase its practical applications in areas like agriculture, education, health, and fintech. The content will feature African innovators and use storytelling approaches to inspire local participation.
Decision Items:
it was decided that our meeting retains its normal time being 5pm on thrusday
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Action Items:
[action] The Q4 marketing initiative team to select the winners of the campaign. [assignee] esewilliams, CJFrankie, Ayo, LadyTempestt [due] 30 January 2025 [status] todo
Keywords/tags:
topics covered: AMA session, Q1 budget, marketing initiatives, Partnership, education initiatives
emotions: Welcoming, Collaborative, Discursive
Friday 24th January 2025
Marketing Guild
Type of meeting: Weekly
Present: Ayo [facilitator], Eric Davies [documenter], Gorga Siagian, Ayo, CJFrankie, LordKizzy, AshleyDawn, Eric Davies, kenichi, advanceameyaw, photogee, Kateri, PeterE, Mikasa, SubZero, hogantuso, Fav, esewilliams, Evelyn
Purpose: Marketing Guild weekly meeting
Discussion Points:
Introductory Message for Media Room: Kizzy kicked off the meeting by presenting the introductory message for the media room to the representatives of each guild and workgroup. The purpose was to guide them in reaching out to the social media admins for scheduling and coordination.
Member Attendance Report: Kizzy presented the attendance review sheet, explaining the color-coded system. Members in green were approved to retain their roles, those in orange would be demoted to task force members, and those in red would no longer contribute to the group.
Roles and Responsibilities: Kizzy outlined the roles and responsibilities for each member of the Marketing Guild, explaining how members can take on specific roles
Event role creation: A new role, called the Event Role, was created. The primary purpose of this role is to have someone attend events, promote SingularityNET and its events, and evaluate the impact of the events using metrics such as attendance, engagement, and ROI. This role will also involve seeking potential collaboration opportunities.
Attendance and Role Demotion: Kenichi expressed opposition to the idea of demotion based on his performance in the task role. He recommended that his attendance in Q3 be considered in comparison to Q4 when evaluating his role.
Attendance Reminder: Kizzy emphasized the importance of providing prior notice in case of absence. He reminded the team that, as core team members, attending calls—especially for decision-making—is mandatory. He also noted that Task Force members are not as tightly bound to this requirement.
Attendance Discrepancy: Malik pointed out that he was marked absent on October 4th, 2024, despite having evidence to show that he was present.
Rules and Reassessment: Kizzy clarified that the current rules will apply only for this quarter. The team will reassess at the end of the quarter. Members who meet the criteria for promotion will be moved back to core team status, while those who don’t will be demoted to Task Force members. Members who fail to meet at least 50% of the criteria will not hold any role in the marketing team.
Town Hall meeting update: Kizzy suggested that for Town Hall meeting update, we went through an assessment of the roles and responsibilities. We completed the Zealy sprints that we had previously.
Twitter Upgrade: Mikasa mentioned that the team is upgrading from Twitter Premium to Twitter Plus. This decision followed a discussion in the Writers Workgroup last week. The Plus plan offers a range of benefits, with a cost of $22 per month or $229 per year.
Zealot Initiative Feedback: Kenichi commented on the Zealot initiative and shared that the Writers' Workgroup plans to launch a Zealy initiative using their original methods, while Ese emphasized that creating a successful campaign takes time.
Decision Items:
We agreed to create a poll for members to vote for or against the demotion of members who don’t meet the attendance benchmark.
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Action Items:
[action] Kareem will prepare to present the governance document during the next call. [assignee] kareem [status] todo
[action] Eric Davies to confirm Malik’s attendance to potentially improve his overall performance metrics. [assignee] Eric Davies [status] todo
[action] All members to discuss the governance presentation in preparation for the next call. [assignee] all members [status] todo
[action] All members to engage in discussions about task submission and assessment to improve accountability and performance. [assignee] all members [status] todo
[action] Cjfrankie to fill EYOR on behalf of marketing guild [assignee] CJFrankie [status] todo
Keywords/tags:
topics covered: Roles, TH Update , Zealy, content calendar, Taskforce
emotions: Well-attended, argumentative, forward planning, contructive criticism, heated, fiery
Video Workgroup
Type of meeting: Weekly
Present: Zalfred [facilitator], LordKizzy [documenter], Zalfred, AndrewBen, killy, frosh, Slate, devon, hogantuso, LordKizzy, Malik, prime.eth, SubZero
Purpose: The meeting focused on weekly updates and tasks distribution
Working Docs:
Discussion Points:
UPDATE FROM THE TASK MANAGER A quick update from Malik on various tasks assigned within the week. He highlighted that there were multiple video submissions, and two got approved and scheduled for posting while the townhall edit is currently being worked upon
Update from the Social Media Manager, Andrew Ben noted that he was able to schedule the recent submissions
Town hall updates: Zalfred gave the updates from the previous town hall.
Zealy Discussions: Lordkizzy spoke on the partnership between all three workgroups (Video wg, Writer's wg, and Marketing guild) and noted that there would be a call in the coming week to discuss the structure of the collaboration
AOB: Collaborations with spinoffs projects: Lordkizzy emphasized on the need of the collaboration and members gave their inputs on the structure of the collaboration
AOB: ECOSYSTEM Update Videos: Zalfred and Killy proposal for creating the leftover ecosystem videos was approved, we decided to change the name of the ecosystem videos, tho there are still pending discussions on whether the task will be rotational as we advance, a poll will be created for this on our discord server
AOB: LordKizzy informed the group that he had submitted the video wg report
Decision Items:
We decided to have a poll to determine if the task for creating the ecosystem videos are going to be rotational
[rationale] a poll will be created on our discord channel for this
we decided to change the name of the ecosystem videos
[rationale] the source name (Inside SingularityNET) is currently used by the foundation, lordkizzy is to come up with some suggestions
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Action Items:
[action] Osmium to present the videos from Bangkok [assignee] osmium [due] 24 January 2025 [status] todo
[action] Lordkizzy to submit a short report on the video workgroup achievements to Peter [assignee] LordKizzy [due] 24 January 2025 [status] done
[action] lordkizzy to reach out to Rojo and get feedback on the situation [assignee] LordKizzy [due] 24 January 2025 [status] done
[action] Slate was appointed Task manager for the month [assignee] Slate [due] 21 February 2025 [status] todo
[action] Tuso was appointed facilitator for the month [assignee] hogantuso [due] 21 February 2025 [status] todo
[action] Zalfred was appointed Meeting documentation for the month [assignee] Zalfred [due] 21 February 2025 [status] todo
[action] Malik was appointed Town Hall edit for the month [assignee] Malik [due] 21 February 2025 [status] todo
[action] Subzero was appointed Town hall summary edit for the month [assignee] SubZero [due] 21 February 2025 [status] todo
[action] Lordkizzy and Devon were appointed as the Quality control team for the month [assignee] LordKizzy, devon [due] 21 February 2025 [status] todo
Keywords/tags:
topics covered: Video Edit, Q1 2025 goals, Ecosystem Update videos, Zealy, Town Hall Videos, Spin off collab, Task Assignment
emotions: Friendly, Collaborative, Thoughtful , lengthy
Writers Workgroup
Type of meeting: Weekly
Present: kenichi [facilitator], CJFrankie [documenter], kenichi, Mikasa, CJFrankie, Gorga Siagian, Emmauel, devon, Nebula, LordKizzy, Fav Eni, Évéline Trinité
Purpose: The weekly meeting of the writers workgroup
Narrative:
Kick-off: The writers' workgroup weekly meeting kicked off at 3:10 p.m. Kenichi skimmed through the action items from the last meeting.
Twitter Premium+: We started by discussing how three workgroups (writers, video, and marketing) can collaborate to subscribe to a Twitter premium plan. Kenichi added that it would be a great idea for us to pay for a yearly subscription.
Community page on X: One of the WWG's missions for 2025 is to see our platforms grow while reaching a wider audience, such as crypto and web3 enthusiasts. In our last meeting, we decided to start pushing out Town Hall recaps: a weekly report that covers highlights from the ambassadors program. More so, the monthly workgroup updates are no different! We also seek to share these insights with the community using the community page on X. Kenichi also spoke about the need for having moderators on the community page to oversee the process and also reply to questions from anyone. Additionally, he urged Scribblers to join the page and also introduce themselves.
Momentarily, Mikasa added that some of the engagement on X is from people outside the ambassador program; she suggested integrating a bot that would create an announcement on the discord server for people to see when new announcements are made. This led to a discussion about whether to have a separate channel for these announcements. Kenichi embraced the idea and said he’d reach out to Peter to discuss things further.
Web3 publishing platforms: This conversation started in Q4 2024. In this meeting, CjFrankie showcased Mirror.XYZ. A Web3 publishing platform that allows publishers to turn their fans or readers into collectors, it also allows publishers to mint all their content, and it allows for collaboration through co-authorship and multi-sigs. In the same light, Gorga introduced Cardano Spot, he added that the WWG can take advantage of it since we’re building on a Cardano platform, he said that the platform enables users to create a community and also publish their work. Kenichi embraced the idea and he asked Gorga to make a presentation for the next meeting, on Friday. Additionally, Kenichi proposed that CjFrankie and Gorga should write an introductory draft for Mirror and Cardano Spot respectively. The draft should introduce the SNET ambassador program, reference the latest updates like the ecosystem digest, and the first introductory draft of the ambassador program published on Medium.
Zealy collaboration: The meeting featured the likes of LordKizzy, who seeks collaboration between WWG, video WG, and the marketing guild. According to Kenichi, the next Zealy sprint would kick off by February, and as a result, the three workgroups would need to discuss what the reward structure would be like, how quests would be reviewed, and whatnot.
Role document: The WWG role document describes the roles of scribblers and scribes in the workgroup; Kenichi hinted that the role document would become active from the next meeting. Come next week, we shall review the document to see the KPIs attached to the roles we hold.
Decision Items:
The WWG has decided to use Mirror.xyz to push out content for the community.
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
We have decided that three workgroups (marketing, video WG, and the writers WG) will collaborate to purchase the Twitter premium plus subscription.
[effect] mayAffectOtherPeople
We also decided to use Cardano Spot to build a community and publish content.
[effect] affectsOnlyThisWorkgroup
Action Items:
[action] CjFrankie and Gorga to write an introductory Draft for Mirror.xyz and Cardano spot respectively. [assignee] CJFrankie, Gorga Siagian [due] 7 February 2025 [status] done
[action] Kenichi to create a Mirror.xyz account and grant editing rights to CjFrankie. [assignee] kenichi [due] 14 February 2025 [status] done
[action] Kenichi to create a Cardano Spot account and grant editing rights to Gorga. [assignee] kenichi [due] 14 February 2025 [status] done
[action] Gorga to showcase how Cardano Spot works and how DAOs can use it. [assignee] Gorga Siagian [due] 7 March 2025 [status] done
[action] Kenichi to draft a document for the structure, rules, and reward allocation for the forthcoming Zealy campaign. [assignee] kenichi [due] 7 February 2025 [status] done
[action] Kenichi to chase Peter and discuss how to integrate a bot that would create an announcement on the discord server for people to see when new announcements are made on Twitter. [assignee] kenichi [due] 21 February 2025 [status] done
Learning Points:
We learned how Mirror.XYZ can help DAOs support their work, mint their content, and give them full ownership over their content and readers.
Cardano Spot is a platform to build a community and publish written content for audiences.
Keywords/tags:
topics covered: Cardano Spot, Mirror.xyz, Zealy collab, Engagement, Bots, Community page, Twitter, Web3 publishing platform, X premium, Weekly TH recaps, Role document , KPIs, Collaboration
emotions: informative, Educative, lengthy, Collaborative
Last updated