> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://snet-ambassadors.gitbook.io/singularitynet-archive/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://snet-ambassadors.gitbook.io/singularitynet-archive/timeline/2023/october-2023/week-42.md).

# Week 42

9th October to 15th October 2023

{% embed url="<https://github.com/orgs/SingularityNET-Archive/projects/1/views/3?itemId=39607163&pane=issue>" %}

## Monday 9th October 2023 <a href="#docs-internal-guid-7d5ecf6b-7fff-77ee-366e-80170a57b5bf" id="docs-internal-guid-7d5ecf6b-7fff-77ee-366e-80170a57b5bf"></a>

### <mark style="color:green;">Education Guild</mark>

#### Present:

Peter; Rojo; Curtis; WaKa; Slate; Osmium; Tevo; Headelf \[facilitator] \[documenter]

#### Agenda:

Self-education

#### Summary:

Discussion on scope of issues and topics for ambassador education. It varied between basic education or a deeper, more detailed course. There was optimism on what had been done to date. Curtis commented on the different scopes covered but thought it was not enough.

Headelf played a video he had created.

Rojo presented his concept for a Masterclass. It was well received and discussed for a while.

GimbaLabs was brought up by Curtis and their use of SLT - Student Learning Targets. It was flexible and could be one set or individual SLTS. Curtis also suggested creating buckets that would contain proprietary learning targets.

Rojo likened these to courses at the University where a syllabus is provided to students.

Curtis pivoted the convo back to SLTs and questioned what our objective would be. Why are we building these SLTs and what would be unique for our course? Was a big question.

Waka brought up and a discussion ensued about Google Class. Good, bad????

Rojo questioned if we should use the Andamio platform, created by Gimbalabs, which Curtis was familiar with. A suggestion to make it a quest app like claim 5 points and / or make it for credentials.

Tevo brought up a solid concept about how people learn when they teach.

#### Meeting length:

1.15 hours

#### Action items:

**\[Action]:** Create videos for comparison for the following week.

***

### <mark style="color:green;">Knowledge Base Workgroup</mark>

Not this week

***

## Tuesday 10th October 2023

### Governance WorkGroup

No summary given

***

### Ambassador Town Hall

No summary given

#### Video

{% embed url="<https://youtu.be/4bhTNXdXRyU?si=V1KmOdBO8Mwbdr_u>" %}

***

### <mark style="color:green;">Incubation Guild Think-Tank</mark>

#### **Organization of Incubation Guild:**

* Goal is to distribute the guild across interested community members for greater decentralisation
* Q4 Treasury gives opportunity to handle treasury in a decentralised way - an experiment in self-organisation
* Meetings to include think tanks and AI sandbox discussions.

**Topics Discussed:**

* Recap on discussion of research projects
* Ways to engage community members actively in Incubation Guild
* Open debates stemming from research findings
* Open sourcing to identify problems/topics to research, with freedom to decentralise funding

**Reflections on Incubation Guild Development:**

* Most volunteer activity could be rewarded with minimum $10/hr based on estimated time commitment
* Social incentives important - expertise/knowledge, leadership opportunities, reputation
* Q4 idea: start with all voluntary work, build up mini-treasury for incubation guild
* Consider non-profit / steward ownership / other organisation models
* Join for the social mission and values
* Take inspiration from cypherpunk manifestos and hacker ethos
* Book clubs to read/discuss literature together and build shared understanding
* Use Incubation channel to share research papers
* Consider paying experts to provide guidance

***

## Wednesday 11th October 2023

### <mark style="color:green;">Archives Workgroup</mark>

Not this week

***

### <mark style="color:green;">Dework PBL Workgroup</mark>

#### **Present:**

Tevo, Andre, Headelf, Sucren, Effiom

#### **Purpose:**

This Workgroup focuses on creating educational project-based learning material for Dework on the Andamio platform in collaboration with Gimbalabs and Governance Guild.

#### **Meeting notes:**

<https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVM7pbrUg=/?moveToWidget=3458764565346051398&cot=10>

**Meeting Video Summary:**

{% embed url="<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isIc4PkB-Rg>" %}

#### **Dework Updates:**

<https://app.dework.xyz/singularitynet-ambas/dework-pbl-workgroup>

#### **Agenda**

#### **1) Review new Draft lessons**

**Decision items**\
We continue improving our assigned lessons.

**Action Items**\
Address session feedback into Project Method Lesson - Tevo 25.10.23\
Address session feedback into Wallet Registration Lesson - Andre 25.10.23\
Address session feedback into Meeting Method Recording Lesson - Sucren 25.10.23\
Play around with Git pull request to prepare for GitLab Pull Request Lesson - Andre, Tevo 25.10.23\
Address Google Form feedback to update some Lessons - Tevo 25.10.23

#### **2) Technical Platform Discussions**

#### **Discussion Points**

Would it be possible to create pagebreak links? The mobile view is not formatted correctly and texts are going out of the boundaries Updated Technical Request Document

#### **Keywords**

PBL, Dework, Miro Board, Lessons, Google Form, Andamio

Meeting Recording Method Lesson - <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1X7JHQzz-_JPgzPrB0lgTEcahcDBxSxYqKx7Z3UArRE8/edit>

Wallet Registration Lesson - <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ehuV-fNGlp4qCT-QcYjn0ABLZQ8qIIsyVQZQBYuCg34/edit#heading=h.b5lthw1hz4mw>

Project Method Lesson - <https://andamio-andamiojs-starter-lms-git-governance-g-1b84f0-gimbalabs.vercel.app/course/module/301/3012>

Technical Requests - <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1peYOJ9oC60hU1L70xR9mwb9LJwPqESXInIV5NjTcaqo/edit>

Sentiment Analysis Google Form - <https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf6nE6vV9AFzb2cdNf6ekAELyRMB5rhTTeuWHIm41A1urHFkg/viewform>

The meeting felt busy as we had a lot to review and didn't get to other prepared agenda items

***

### <mark style="color:green;">Incubation Guild</mark>

Not this week

***

### <mark style="color:green;">Strategy Guild</mark>

Not this week

***

## Thursday 12th October 2023

### <mark style="color:green;">Onboarding Workgroup</mark>

#### Present: <a href="#docs-internal-guid-d23e5535-7fff-a8aa-50ac-228b2953f9d8" id="docs-internal-guid-d23e5535-7fff-a8aa-50ac-228b2953f9d8"></a>

Sucre n Spice \[facilitator]; Vani \[documenter]; Peter; LadyTempestt; LordKizzy; Tevo

#### Minutes of last meeting:

Agreed as a correct record

#### Action items from last meeting:

* No, the recording of 7th Sept onboarding session is not yet on Youtube; been over a month now. Do we still want clips made? **\[Decision]** Yes, we still want clips if possible, but the priority is getting video up. \[ACTION] Sucre will chase it; hopefully will be up before next meeting.
* Couple of new ideas in [Onboarding WG - how can we support other WGs to onboard new people in their meetings](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fYx3CXgT-NGi19TmBUxS3lTMu93Hx68cpGST8TED9cA/edit?usp=sharing) **\[Decision]** We’ll discuss whole issue in a future meeting; and there is enough to discuss, so only add more if you have a really genius idea.

#### Agenda

#### 1) Quick check of [Getting Started doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1q4dhediWgcbgAP3Wfsky_-roVyfCUe6xi-dhBdHbU4s/edit?usp=sharing) -

No new comments have been added

RE: asking Social Media team to e.g. tweet an invite link to Getting Started channel, with “If you’re curious how to become an sNET ambassador...”? \[Decision] Better to do it as a tweet thread; but we didn’t decide who will progress this.

New people are applying to be ambassadors - \[Action] Sucre to tweak the onboarding email so it matches what we now have in #GettingStarted, and send it out to them. Discussion of best Discord link to get them to #Getting Started? \[Action] Peter to try to work out best link

#### 2) Introducing meeting summary templates from Archives WG

* Before the meeting, Sucre and Vani decided on the Minimalist template; will probably add action and decision items as a customisation.
* LadyTempestt agreed to try minuting using this template, starting next meeting.
* **\[Action]** LadyTempestt and Vani to meet before next Onboarding meeting to customise the template.

#### 3) Payment structures and how we pay for work in this WG

Continuing the discussion from last session. See: [SNET Onboarding WG Task Reward Sheet](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/0/d/1mwFPPabzXLixDG_LkKvFp5tRER30sxT_wGV3ySt-MZ4/edit), [Onboarding Workgroup | Dework](https://app.dework.xyz/singularitynet-ambas/onboarding-workgroup), and [Contribution-Based Budgeting Model](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZQA9xOyKFoiOgzI9ED9pExPIWs62tH9i_r_CSib6S-k/edit?usp=sharing) - a new idea for a model fromTevo

* We agreed on a price for documentation. Same approach as facilitation - more for first timers, to reward stepping up; and a little to someone to offer mentorship for first timers.
* Discussed but not agreed - quality control for documentation.
* We agreed that document creation (i.e. making discussion docs for people to contribute to) will probably be c. 8hrs a month. $20 per doc suggested. Still to discuss what people should be paid for contributing to a doc - and is it a flat rate, a price per contribution, or something to do with perceived “quality” of contribution? There’s also a few other tasks to discuss and price.
* Question: Are we trying to move towards price per task, or do we want a price per time or per contribution? Tevo’s Contribution model \*can\* work with any of these, although it does enforce “price-per-hour thinking”. How we price things might vary depending what it is.
* Question: Contribution model says “Calculate the percentage of the total time spent by each member in relation to the overall time contributed by all members.” - is this across whole program, or each WG? Depends whether WGs have their own budgets or not.
* Sucre: advocates WGs having a definite budget per WG, and if they go over, they can’t dip in again. The meeting largely agreed, tho didn’t come to a definite resolution - further discussion next week.
* Question: in Q3 review sessions it’s been suggested that a WG’s budget will be based on what it spent last quarter? Should this be the case? since the scope of a WG’s work might change since then? Or should it be based on a projection, based on what they plan to do this quarter? Or something else?
* Do we as a WG need to work out our idea of what we think we will spend in total in Q4, or not? General agreement that yes, we should continue to go through [SNET Onboarding WG Task Reward Sheet](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/0/d/1mwFPPabzXLixDG_LkKvFp5tRER30sxT_wGV3ySt-MZ4/edit) and price the tasks, and discuss what work we think we’ll do overall this quarter, to try to arrive at a projection. Noted that this will cover regular tasks and one-offs, which may be harder to predict - so need contingency money?
* Program-wide budget discussions will continue in Treasury Guild and in Q3 assessment sessions; final decision will be in TH.

**\[Decision]** - we’ll continue the process of pricing our tasks in next week’s meeting

**\[Action]** - members of this WG will try to attend Treasury/ Q3 assessment sessions.

***

### <mark style="color:green;">Treasury Guild</mark>

Not this week

***

### <mark style="color:green;">Incubation: AI Sandbox</mark>

Cancelled for this week

***

### <mark style="color:green;">Deepfunding Town Hall</mark>

Not this week

***

## Friday 13th October 2023

### Writers' Workgroup

Meeting cancelled.

***

### <mark style="color:green;">Video Workgroup</mark>

#### Present:

Rojo \[facilitator], Agus, Judith, OEP, Peter, TUSO, Lilycupcake.

#### In this meeting we:

* Introduced our new 3 members.
* Had an update about our operation.
* Talked about the new weekly tasks (i.e. Town Hall editing, Town Hall summaries)
* Explained the process of making a contribution to the video workgroup.
* Updated about social media postings.
* Peter suggested some topics for videos.
* Opened the discussion to general questions.

#### Decisions:

none

#### Action items:

\[action] Make weekly tasks on Dework for editing the Town Hall recording and its summary video.

***


---

# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.

## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter:

```
GET https://snet-ambassadors.gitbook.io/singularitynet-archive/timeline/2023/october-2023/week-42.md?ask=<question>&goal=<endgoal>
```

`ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
`goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal.

The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.