Week 26
19th June to 25th June 2023
Last updated
19th June to 25th June 2023
Last updated
This week's meeting was small and informal, so it was not recorded
Coming soon
Context:
We Prioritize critical Ambassador Activities and cover process changes
1) Tested ABCD + F to-do list model
Description - A new model to help us organize tasks Decision - We continue using ABCF + F model for future prioritizations Action - Include a different process to differentiate done tasks before adding them to voting Insight - a good way to discuss and coordinate Insight - silly to vote on things that are already done Learning - Starting from checking the most aligned immediate tasks and delegating tasks helps us to prioritize activities Learning - Priority also depends on capacity Insight - Agendas and tasks should have some basic requirements to be able to determine the urgency for discussion
Description - testing DAO tools to engage participants and contributors in decision-making models Decision - We discontinue testing and using the Summon platform Action - Try different platforms for decision making Insight - It's not an open source to improve our use cases Learning - can't export data effectively Learning - Confusing user experience
Reorganize Ambassador tasks to new view to include latest learnings Prepare async voting to try to get more collective insight on tasks and see if there are differences.
Establishing or maintaining processes to help community members to efficiently collaborate together
We aren't here to force process change ... but instead, to model existing process ... plus small recommended refinements based on our experience and best practices. Goal: client workgroups are engaged in the modeled processes Dework Action - get feedback from Writers Workgroup
Governance workgroup? Decision: That group is still a bit early; not yet fully formed
Process workgroup? we can model our own processes prefer to take external processes at higher priority Decision: defer
Quarterly Ambassador Budget creation process? That activity is still in progress Want to address soon, while the experience and learnings are still fresh in minds. Decision: likely next priority
Modeling Workgroup-formation process? not a working group per se, but... we can provide one or more models that a working group can follow to achieve effective formation possible that different types of workgroups can have different processes e.g. Writers workgroup vs Governance workgroup Decision: This will be our current priority. Insight: meta analysis can be useful
Learning
Administrative Today's meeting not prepared well. Miro frame needs to be ready in meeting board! ...along with other checklist items Dework Action: Update task templates for prep and summary activities
@Slate will arrange meeting board and other prep activities for next week's meeting.
coming soon
coming soon
How to structure Ambassador rules around payments, tasks and anything related to financial activities.
1) Ambassador Role
Description - How are we going to reward Ambassador Role going forward? Action - Create Google form to collect async information to sense direction Insight - We have created a very mix role and its unclear how to move forward with the role Learning - Workgroup lead role should get the ability to request funds not ambassadors
We continue to ponder changes and rules for Ambassador Program budget. Share your insight through upcoming Google Form (will be shared in Treasury Guild channel), how to move forward with Ambassador role.
coming soon
Rojo [facilitator] [documenter], Tevo, Lilycupcake.
Made a short review of last month’s growth and KPIs review.
Talked about the future vote for Agus’ video.
Worked on the KPI sheet with Tevo.
No summary given
Description - new process to help distribute SingularityNET Ambassador budget more effectively and faster Decision - the feature can only be used by workgroup leads Decision - Treasury Guild members add themselves to reviewers while if they audit fund request Decision - There has to be proof of where the rewards will be allocated if request is 100$ or more Insight - Fund Request Doc:
Video WorkGroup Carrd:
