Week 36
28th August to 3rd September 2023
Last updated
28th August to 3rd September 2023
Last updated
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
No summary given
No summary given
Not this week
Not this week.
This Workgroup focuses on creating educational project-based learning material for Dework on the Andamio platform in collaboration with Gimbalabs and Governance Guild.
https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVM7pbrUg=/?moveToWidget=3458764562259502651&cot=10
Description - A way to collect async feedback about the onboarding content Insight - Feedback form is ready Insight - Feedback form move to Ambassador Drive so others can also see feedback
Description - Go over all finalized material and see if it now suits our needs [Decision] - postpone sentiment analysis until we have live website [Action] - Go over lessons with the thought of simplest action we could use for each lesson. [Decision] - we look at Dework tasks next meeting (Dework didn't work)
[Action] Those who picked up new lessons will be drafting new content [Action] Find a way to get Dework PBL online.
Establishing or maintaining processes to help community members to efficiently collaborate together.
https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVM7pbrQg=/?moveToWidget=3458764562443714715&cot=10
Description - A table that lists all the requirements to establish a workgroup or a program for Ambassador Program [Decision] - The result is ready for adoption [Decision] - Seed Workgroup does not require a roadmap [Decision] - If goals are longer than 3 months, there have to be milestones in the roadmap Insight - Removed Fund Request related information from evaluation row (it's covered in resource section)
Description - Discussed Workgroup rewards, management and next steps [Decision] - We will take a small break and skip next week [Action] - Coordinate a new Process Modeling Workgroup meeting time https://www.when2meet.com/?21161533-9RDo9
Description - We have decided rules to analyze our results, but we have not described how. [Decision] - We may start documenting guides on the day we start evaluating any workgroup based on proposals Insight - We don't have the details of how we evaluate Workgroups Insight - We review assets, outputs and contribution dashboard [Action] - provide simple guidelines or steps to take to evaluate workgroups
[Action] Create proposals for each existing Workgroups and Programs.
Osmium, WaKa, Slate, Fly, Peter, Headelf [facilitator] [documenter].
Code of Conduct
This was in part a pivot away from the Code of Ethics into a full-blown Code of Conduct for the Singularitynet ecosystem. A very in-depth convo ensued with a lot of philosophical points on what a CoC entailed. With my (Headelf) being the scribe as well as facilitator and meeting leader the notes may be a little weak. The comments do not necessarily have the speaker noted.
First comments discussed the direction of the code of conduct vs the Code of Ethics. It was thought that we should strive towards having the community working together. It should not be a code of criminal. Maybe consider it as a Process Resolution with teeth. Goal is to have completed prior to 4th quarter. Ideation, editing within the workgroup. Then bring the doc out to the greater community for discussion, ratification and vote.
It was thought that the ambassador program should encourage members to do what they love to do. Convo flexed to definitions of Ambassadors and their roles. It was noted that this convo had broken down and virtually halted due to some behavior that was unacceptable to other members.
The convo covered Onboarding and its planned meeting in near future. A beginning doc was created for async work and was to be published for community editing.
[Action]: edit and comment on the doc.
1 hour.
Sucre’nSpice [facilitator], Headelf, Vani [documenter], Peter
Onboarding Workgroup minutes, 31st Aug 2023
agreed as a correct record
mostly done; except that WaKa has posted that he doesn’t agree with the approach being taken for the Getting Started channel, and he doesn’t have time to completely restructure it as he would like.
Discussed the idea (from Rojo) of a “Media” workgroup, which the proposed Graphics workgroup could become part of
Finalised the slide deck for next week’s Onboarding session - particularly, what to say about finances and rewards for being an Ambassador
Decided who will present which parts of the slides next week
[ACTION]: SucrenSpice to reach out to Slate and let him know to chat with Rojo about the Graphics group possibly collaborating with, or being part of, a “Media” WG.
[ACTION] Vani to finish Slide 7 in the slide deck for the onboarding session
[ACTION] SucrenSpice to contact Devon re: adding a line of text to his infographic about the Onboarding session
[ACTION] All to help publicise the session
[ACTION]: SucrenSpice, Vani, Peter and Tommy to attend the onboarding session and help present, as follows:
Intro, onboarding video, and slides up to slide 8 - SucrenSpice
Slides 9- 15 - Vani
Slides 16 - 25- Tommy
QnA and last slide - Peter
Thurs 14th Sept, 13:00 UTC (Note that the meeting on 7th Sept will be an onboarding session for new people, so the next actual workgroup meeting is 14th Sept.)
Not this week
Not this week
No summary given
This meeting is a bi-weekly session that involves proofreading articles and onboarding new members
Kenichi [facilitator], Mikasa [documenter], Devon, Emmanuel, Slate
Kenichi gave us a warm welcome to the new month
Articles on our Medium page have been getting good impressions since last month. We urge everyone to follow our medium page and give 2 or 50 claps on our articles
The last Zarqa article published got 150 views - an impressive milestone
Slate gave an update regarding his task
There's a new structure to be implemented in the WWG called ELI5 (explain like I'm 5), which we are going to use in writing atomic essays.
A new member, Emmanuel, was informed about the onboarding, work and structure of the WWG
Everyone was advised to read up on LLMs because there is lot of content coming out
Each Scribbler and Scribe was asked to submit their Twitter handles; they will be tagged on Twitter after their article has been published on the Medium page to promote their works and gain recognition
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1usfm5zWHYXzvBb3nHa2Rodx7FgUQGlx6UratfcNjlYQ/edit?usp=sharing Doc on partnerships and spinoffs within SingularityNET was shared for review and editing
The last 15 minutes of the meeting was used to edit and access articles meant to be published and some submitted works
The meeting was concluded after a successful editing session.
